Michigan House Bill HB4247

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/17/23
• Refer: 3/9/23
• Report Pass: 5/4/23
• Engrossed: 5/10/23
• Refer: 5/11/23
• Report Pass: 5/17/23

Caption

Appropriations: department of corrections; appropriations for fiscal year 2023-2024; provide for. Creates appropriation act.

Impact

The provisions outlined in HB4247 declare that the total state spending from state sources, under this appropriation act for the fiscal year, is set at $100. Notably, the bill stipulates that no state funds will be distributed to local units of government. This act is significant as it reflects the state government's approach to budget allocation, particularly in relation to correctional services, while potentially raising questions about the adequacy of the financial provisions for a department typically tasked with managing a wide array of services within the state's correctional system.

Summary

House Bill 4247 is a legislative measure aimed at establishing appropriations for the Michigan Department of Corrections for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024. The bill makes a gross appropriation for the department amounting to $100, exclusively sourced from the state general fund. The intent behind this bill is to secure funding necessary for the operations of the Department of Corrections, thereby ensuring that state correctional facilities can maintain their functions and services with the allocated financial resources.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB4247 seems mixed, primarily due to the exceedingly low amount proposed for department funding. Supporters argue that any funding is better than none, while critics might point to the insufficient resources being allocated to a crucial public service. The bill may reflect broader trends within state budgeting that prioritize fiscal conservatism over expansive funding for departments that require substantial financial backing.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding HB4247 lies in its very nature of the appropriation amount, which raises questions regarding the sufficiency of funds required for the Department of Corrections to operate effectively. Advocates for the department may express concern that such minimal appropriations could lead to challenges in maintaining housing, rehabilitation programs, and other essential services for inmates. This discussion also touches on the broader implications of state funding policies and their impacts on criminal justice reform initiatives and public safety.