North Dakota Senate Bill SB2011

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/7/25
• Refer: 1/7/25
• Report Pass: 1/30/25
• Engrossed: 2/4/25
• Refer: 2/18/25
• Report Pass: 4/8/25
• Enrolled: 4/28/25
• Passed: 5/1/25

Caption

AN ACT to provide an appropriation for defraying the expenses of the highway patrol; to provide for a transfer; and to provide an exemption.

Impact

The bill reflects a commitment to support law enforcement in North Dakota through necessary funding while ensuring the financial stability of the highway patrol. By providing allocations for new hires, equipment, and operational needs, SB2011 aims to enhance public safety and operational efficiency. The financial provisions included in the act suggest that while the patrol continues to operate under its existing framework, the additional funding would allow it to address emerging challenges in law enforcement and public safety over the two-year span.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 2011 is an appropriation bill aimed at funding the expenses associated with the North Dakota Highway Patrol for the biennium beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2027. The total budget proposed for the highway patrol is approximately $85 million, which includes both general and special funds. Significant one-time funding items are allocated for purposes such as replacing equipment and enhancements to the motor pool, which indicates a proactive approach toward maintaining law enforcement capabilities and resources across the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB2011 appears largely supportive, with stakeholders recognizing the importance of adequate funding for the highway patrol to ensure that law enforcement can respond effectively to the public's needs. The bill passed overwhelmingly in both legislative chambers, signaling broad bipartisan backing. Only a single dissenting vote in the House highlights a high level of confidence in the proposed budget and its importance to maintaining state safety and order.

Contention

While garnering significant support, there may be areas of contention regarding specific allocations and spending priorities within the budget. Some legislators might express concerns about the effectiveness of such funding in the absence of clear performance metrics or accountability measures for expenditures. This dynamic suggests that future discussions could revolve around ensuring transparency and effectiveness in how appropriated funds are utilized by the highway patrol, balancing between necessary law enforcement funding and fiscal responsibility.