A resolution amending Senate Rules for the Ninetieth General Assembly.
Impact
The impact of SR12 on state laws mainly revolves around legislative governance and procedural norms. By updating the Senate Rules, the resolution facilitates a more organized approach to how the Senate conducts its business. This is particularly important in extraordinary sessions, where timely and effective governance is essential. The revisions aim to streamline deliberations and potentially improve legislative outcomes by ensuring that all members are aware of and adhere to the updated protocols.
Summary
Senate Resolution 12, passed on July 11, 2023, addresses amendments to the Senate Rules for the Ninetieth General Assembly. This resolution aims to clarify procedures and the order of business for the extraordinary session, ensuring a structured framework for legislative discussions and decision-making. Such amendments are critical for maintaining the efficiency of the Assembly, particularly during busy periods when numerous bills and resolutions are under consideration.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SR12 appears largely supportive among legislators, reflecting a consensus on the need for clarity and order in the legislative process. The efficient handling of Senate business is generally seen as beneficial, particularly in expediting the passage of important legislation. However, there may be some dissent regarding specific amendments, which could reflect broader disagreements on procedural approaches among various Senate factions.
Contention
While SR12 was adopted with a notable majority vote of 33 in favor and 15 against, the division suggests that there were significant discussions about certain procedural changes. The contention likely arises from differing views on how rules should be structured or operated, with some members possibly perceiving the amendments as infringing on their procedural rights or altering the collaborative dynamics of the Assembly. The exact points of contention are not detailed in the text, but this voting history indicates a spectrum of opinions on legislative governance.
A resolution relating to the Senate Code of Ethics governing the conduct of members of the Senate in relation to their senatorial duties during the Ninetieth General Assembly.(Formerly SSB 1075.)
A concurrent resolution relating to the joint rules governing lobbyists of the Senate and House of Representatives for the Ninetieth General Assembly.(See HCR 7.)
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.