Indiana 2025 Regular Session

Indiana Senate Bill SB0147

Introduced
1/8/25  
Refer
1/8/25  
Report Pass
1/23/25  
Engrossed
2/18/25  

Caption

Physician referrals and reimbursement rates.

Impact

The implementation of SB 147 will significantly alter the regulatory landscape for healthcare practices in Indiana. By enforcing the prohibition of referral compensation and placing an investigative authority with the Attorney General, the bill seeks to enhance accountability among healthcare providers. It also mandates that the all-payer claims database publish physician reimbursement rates as separate line items, thereby allowing greater public access to crucial financial data related to healthcare services.

Summary

Senate Bill 147 aims to regulate physician referrals and reimbursement rates within the state of Indiana by aligning with the federal Stark Law, which prohibits referral compensation under certain conditions. The bill explicitly states that a referring physician cannot receive compensation or incentives from a healthcare entity or another physician within the same network for referring patients. This measure is designed to minimize conflicts of interest in medical practices and ensure transparency in physician referrals.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SB 147 appears to be generally positive among its supporters, such as healthcare reform advocates, who view the bill as a step toward greater integrity and transparency in the healthcare system. However, there may be concerns from certain physician groups who feel that the restrictions could limit their operational flexibility and affects how they manage patient referrals. The anticipation of any unintended consequences stemming from the limitations imposed by the bill may generate further discussions.

Contention

While advocates argue that SB 147 will strengthen healthcare provision and protect patients from potential exploitation, opponents might contend that the bill complicates existing referral systems and creates additional regulatory burdens. The central contentious point revolves around the regulation of healthcare practices—the balance between ensuring ethical patient treatment without overregulating the professional autonomy of physicians. As the bill moves closer to implementation, stakeholders are likely to engage in debates about its implications on both patient care and physician practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB920

Medical Board of California: investigations: record requests.

TX HB3820

Relating to health care specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect investigations and assessments.

LA SB286

Provides relative to the Physician's Bill of Rights. (8/1/18) (RE INCREASE SG EX See Note)

CA AB1422

Workers’ compensation insurance: fraud.

TX HB2134

Relating to health care specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect investigations and assessments.

TX SB1578

Relating to the use of opinions from medical professionals in making certain determinations relating to the abuse or neglect of a child.

TX SB133

Relating to the regulation and certification of medical examiners and the conduct of autopsy and inquest investigations by justices of the peace and medical examiners; providing penalties.

LA HB778

Provides relative to the composition of the La. State Board of Medical Examiners and investigations of physicians conducted by the board