Relating to the creation of the criminal offense of trespass in a facility housing an animal and to restitution for property damage resulting from that trespass.
Impact
The introduction of HB 1720 would affect state laws by categorizing unauthorized entry into animal facilities as a state jail felony, increasing to a felony of the third degree if the trespasser harasses an animal resulting in injury or death. By doing so, it aims to deter harmful actions towards animals while reinforcing the focus on their safety and welfare. Furthermore, the law would also obligate offenders found guilty to make restitution for any damages caused, broadening the scope of consequences beyond merely serving time or facing fines.
Summary
House Bill 1720 proposes the creation of a criminal offense related to trespassing in facilities that house animals, such as zoos and educational centers. The bill specifically amends the Penal Code to add provisions regarding such offenses, defining certain acts as harassment towards animals and establishing penalties for those who enter enclosures without permission. If enacted, the bill signifies a shift in legal perspectives to enhance protections for animals housed in public facilities and adds an element of accountability for individuals who violate these laws.
Sentiment
Sentiment surrounding HB 1720 appears to lean towards support from animal rights advocates and organizations emphasizing the importance of animal welfare. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary measure to ensure the safety and health of animals, as well as to protect facilities from harmful activities. Conversely, there may be concerns regarding the enforcement of such laws and the implications it may have on public interactions with animals in educational settings.
Contention
Notable points of contention could arise in discussions about the balance between public access to animal facilities and the enforcement of strict trespassing laws. Critics may express concerns regarding overreach in penalizing individuals for entering animal enclosures, especially in cases where intentions may not be malicious. Furthermore, the implications surrounding restitution for damages caused could spark debate over the amounts considered appropriate for various offenses, and how that might affect volunteers or emergency responders who may require access to such facilities.
Identical
Relating to the creation of the criminal offense of trespass in a facility housing an animal and to restitution for property damage resulting from that trespass.
Relating to civil and criminal consequences of trespassing on the property of another while entering this state from a neighboring jurisdiction; creating a criminal offense; providing a civil penalty.
Relating to civil and criminal consequences of trespassing on the property of another while entering this state from a neighboring jurisdiction; creating a criminal offense; providing a civil penalty.
Relating to civil and criminal trespass while entering this state from a neighboring jurisdiction without consent of the owner; creating a criminal offense; creating a civil penalty.
Relating to the creation of the criminal offense of improper entry from a foreign nation and indemnification of certain claims relating to the enforcement of that offense.
Relating to creating a criminal offense for damaging certain critical infrastructure facilities and providing for the prosecution of that conduct as manslaughter in certain circumstances; increasing a criminal penalty.
Relating to measures to ensure the safety and welfare of the border region of this state, including protection from ongoing criminal activity and public health threats and the establishment of the Border Protection Unit; creating a criminal offense; creating a civil penalty.
Relating to creating a criminal offense for damaging certain critical infrastructure facilities and providing for the prosecution of that conduct as manslaughter in certain circumstances; increasing a criminal penalty.