Us Congress House Bill HB10300

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

Caption

Chevron Re-Review Act Congressional Re-Review Act

Impact

If enacted, HB 10300 would significantly alter the dynamics of federal regulatory oversight by granting Congress the explicit authority to disapprove rules that have been previously upheld based on Chevron deference. This could lead to increased scrutiny of agency actions and potentially nullify certain regulations that Congress finds unwarranted. The bill requires agencies to provide comprehensive reports and cost-benefit analyses related to their rules, thereby empowering Congress to make informed decisions regarding which regulations should remain effective or be abolished, thus aligning agency actions more closely with legislative intent.

Summary

House Bill 10300, referred to as the 'Chevron Re-Review Act' or 'Congressional Re-Review Act', addresses the need for congressional oversight of rules implemented by federal agencies that have relied on Chevron deference in their rule-making process. The bill emerged in the context of a Supreme Court decision that overturned previous legal precedents pertaining to Chevron deference, signifying a shift in how agency actions may be challenged and reviewed by Congress. By establishing a framework for Congress to review these rules, the bill aims to enhance accountability and ensure that regulatory measures fall within appropriate bounds as outlined by legislative authority.

Contention

Notably, the legislation has raised points of contention regarding its implications for the independence of regulatory agencies. Critics argue that empowering Congress to disapprove agency rules may hinder the ability of these agencies to enforce regulations effectively, especially in areas necessitating swift action through expert knowledge. Proponents counter that the bill is a necessary check on agency power, facilitating greater legislative control over regulatory actions perceived as overreaching. The balance between effective regulation and congressional oversight is central to the debate surrounding this bill.