Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HB97

Introduced
1/3/25  

Caption

Injunctive Authority Clarification Act of 2025 This bill prohibits federal courts from issuing injunctive orders that bar enforcement of a federal law or policy against a nonparty, unless the nonparty is represented by a party in a class action lawsuit.

Impact

If enacted, HB97 will significantly influence how injunctions are issued in federal courts, particularly in cases that impact a wide range of parties. By restricting the ability of courts to issue orders that affect individuals or groups not directly involved in a lawsuit, the bill is positioned to promote a more orderly and predictable legal environment. This could potentially limit the scope of nationwide injunctions that can arise in cases involving significant federal interests and could lead to more localized judicial decisions that are tied directly to the specific parties at stake in a case.

Summary

House Bill 97, titled the 'Injunctive Authority Clarification Act of 2025', seeks to amend Title 28 of the United States Code by prohibiting the issuance of national injunctions. This bill aims to clarify the authority of federal courts in issuing orders that restrain the enforcement of laws or regulations against non-parties, requiring that such non-parties must be represented by someone acting in a representative capacity according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motivation behind this legislation is to streamline judicial processes and reduce the complexity associated with national injunctions, which have been seen as a source of confusion and inconsistent application of the law across various jurisdictions.

Contention

Discussion surrounding HB97 likely centers on concerns about judicial overreach and the implications for individuals affected by federal regulations. Proponents of the bill argue that limiting national injunctions will help prevent a 'patchwork' of legal standards and enhance judicial efficiency. However, critics may contend that this restriction could deny recourse to individuals who are adversely impacted by federal actions, particularly in cases involving civil rights or public interest issues. By limiting the ability of courts to issue wide-reaching injunctions, opponents may argue that the bill undermines protections for marginalized groups and can restrict necessary checks on federal power.

Congress_id

119-HR-97

Policy_area

Law

Introduced_date

2025-01-03

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

US HB89

Injunctive Authority Clarification Act of 2023 This bill prohibits federal courts from issuing injunctive orders that bar enforcement of a federal law or policy against a nonparty, unless the nonparty is represented by a party in a class action lawsuit.

US HB425

History and Tradition Protection Act of 2023 This bill limits the types of relief that may be awarded in civil suits that involve violations of the Constitution's Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from establishing a religion. Current law provides a statutory civil cause of action against state and local government actors for violations of constitutional rights, also known as Section 1983 lawsuits. The bill limits relief for Section 1983 lawsuits that involve violations of the Establishment Clause to injunctive and declaratory relief (i.e., nonmonetary relief) and prohibits the award of attorneys' fees in these cases, including those that involve monuments, public buildings, official seals, and government proceedings. The bill applies the same restrictions to similar lawsuits against federal agencies.

US HB7094

Marijuana in Federally Assisted Housing Parity Act of 2024

US HB10528

To exempt Federal actions related to energy and mineral activities on certain Federal lands from the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

US SB3671

Marijuana in Federally Assisted Housing Parity Act of 2024

US HB36

Patrick Underwood Federal Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2023 This bill revises the federal criminal statute that prohibits assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain federal officers or employees. Among other changes, the bill increases the applicable penalties for such offenses.

US HB20

Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2023 This bill expands various labor protections related to employees' rights to organize and collectively bargain in the workplace. Among other things, it (1) revises the definitions of employee, supervisor, and employer to broaden the scope of individuals covered by the fair labor standards; (2) permits labor organizations to encourage participation of union members in strikes initiated by employees represented by a different labor organization (i.e., secondary strikes); and (3) prohibits employers from bringing claims against unions that conduct such secondary strikes. The bill also allows collective bargaining agreements to require all employees represented by the bargaining unit to contribute fees to the labor organization for the cost of such representation, notwithstanding a state law to the contrary; and expands unfair labor practices to include prohibitions against replacement of, or discrimination against, workers who participate in strikes. The bill makes it an unfair labor practice to require or coerce employees to attend employer meetings designed to discourage union membership and prohibits employers from entering into agreements with employees under which employees waive the right to pursue or a join collective or class-action litigation. The bill further prohibits employers from taking adverse actions against an employee, including employees with management responsibilities, in response to that employee participating in protected activities related to the enforcement of the prohibitions against unfair labor practices (i.e., whistleblower protections). Such protected activities include providing information about a potential violation to an enforcement agency, participating in an enforcement proceeding, initiating a proceeding concerning an alleged violation or assisting in such a proceeding, or refusing to participate in an activity the employee reasonably believes is a violation of labor laws. Finally, the bill addresses the procedures for union representation elections, provides employees with the ability to vote in such elections remotely by telephone or the internet, modifies the protections against unfair labor practices that result in serious economic harm, and establishes penalties and permits injunctive relief against entities that fail to comply with National Labor Relations Board orders.

US HB279

Pharmacist Conscience Protection Act This bill prohibits the federal government and federally funded entities from discriminating or otherwise taking adverse action against a pharmacist, pharmacy owner, or pharmacy technician who declines to store, fill prescriptions for, or make referrals for drugs that cause abortions (or that the individual provider believes in good faith cause abortions). Individuals or the Department of Justice may bring civil actions for violations of this bill.

US HB157

Citizen Legislature Anti-Corruption Reform of Elections Act or the CLEAN Elections Act This bill establishes requirements for nonpartisan redistricting and open primary elections. States must (1) conduct congressional redistricting using a plan developed by a nonpartisan independent redistricting commission, beginning with the 2020 census; and (2) hold open primaries for federal elections. A state may not use federal funds provided for election administration purposes unless it certifies to the Election Assistance Commission that it (1) conducts redistricting for its state legislative districts using a plan developed by a nonpartisan independent redistricting commission, and (2) holds open primaries for elections for state and local office.

US HB10530

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to modify the goals of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, to eliminate class A and B directors from the board of directors of each Federal reserve bank, and to establish certain reporting requirements for the Board of Governors, and for other purposes.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.