Iowa House Bill HF2138

Iowa 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/24
• Refer: 1/25/24

Caption

A bill for an act relating to the human growth and development curriculum provided by school districts, including enrollment of students in grades seven through twelve in human growth and development courses and information provided to parents and guardians.

Impact

The proposed bill would alter the existing statutes regarding the human growth and development curriculum by ensuring parents are directly involved in their child's education concerning these topics. By requiring written consent, the bill sets a precedent for parental participation, potentially protecting family values and perspectives on sensitive subjects. However, it may also limit students' access to important information and education on human growth and development, which could impact their preparedness for future health-related decisions.

Summary

House File 2138, introduced by Representatives Hayes and Golding, is a legislative proposal that addresses the human growth and development curriculum used in Iowa school districts. The bill aims to control the enrollment of students in grades seven through twelve in human growth and development courses by instituting requirements for parental consent. Specifically, the bill mandates that a school district may not enroll a student in such courses or facilitate attendance at educational conferences without obtaining written informed consent from the student's parent or guardian.

Conclusion

Overall, HF2138 seeks to amend existing laws affecting how school districts handle human growth and development curricula, placing a significant emphasis on parental consent. The outcome of this bill may set important precedents affecting future education policies in Iowa, particularly concerning sensitive subject matters taught in schools.

Contention

There are likely points of contention surrounding HF2138, especially regarding the balance between parental rights and the educational needs of students. Proponents of the bill might argue that it strengthens parental authority in educational matters, providing families with greater control over what their children learn. Conversely, opponents could argue that making such consent a requirement might hinder comprehensive education in human growth and development, depriving students of essential knowledge that should be part of their education.