Iowa House Bill HF2644

Iowa 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/24
• Engrossed: 4/9/24
• Enrolled: 4/29/24
• Refer: 4/9/24
• Passed: 5/17/24

Caption

A bill for an act creating a program and fund for court reporter equipment, and making appropriations. (Formerly HF 2493.) Effective date: 07/01/2024.

Impact

The legislation impacts state laws by facilitating the financial pathway for aspiring court reporters, thereby addressing the ongoing need for qualified professionals in the judicial system. It aims to strengthen the court reporting workforce within the state, ensuring that graduates can afford the requisite equipment and software necessary for their practice. By promoting job security through a loan forgiveness incentive for those who agree to work in Iowa for five years, the bill also fosters retention of trained court reporters in the state.

Summary

House File 2644 establishes a court reporter equipment incentive program aimed at supporting the training and equipment needs of court reporters in Iowa. The bill creates a fund that allocates financial assistance through a student grant program for individuals enrolled in court reporter courses, as well as a graduate forgivable loan program for newly licensed court reporters. The objective is to ensure that trainees have access to the necessary tools for their education and to encourage graduates to enter the workforce in Iowa.

Sentiment

Sentiments around HF2644 tend to lean positively, with broad support from legislators who recognize the importance of bolstering the court reporting profession. Supporters argue that this funding is crucial not only for educational purposes but also for ensuring competent court reporting services are available across Iowa. The bill has been met with essentially unanimous support, as evidenced by the voting history, with all votes cast in favor of the bill during its passage.

Contention

One notable point of contention revolves around funding allocation and prioritization, particularly regarding how funds may be divided among applicants and whether sufficient measures are in place to prioritize applicants actively involved in court-related work. Additionally, some discussions may arise about the sustainability of the funding in future budget allocations, but as of the latest session, there appears to be a strong consensus in favor of supporting the initiative under the current appropriation.