Texas Senate Bill SJR60

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment to increase the amount that the state may contribute to the Employees Retirement System of Texas.

Impact

If enacted, this amendment would have significant implications for the funding and stability of retirement benefits for employees within the state's public sector. Increasing the state's contribution could lead to improvements in the actuarial soundness of the retirement system, providing both immediate and long-term benefits to current and future retirees. However, the necessity of such an increase hinges largely on the state's budgetary capabilities and financial priorities, particularly in light of economic conditions that affect state revenue and expenditures.

Summary

SJR60 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment aimed at increasing the maximum state contribution to the Employees Retirement System of Texas. The amendment seeks to change Section 67(b)(3) of Article XVI of the Texas Constitution, which governs the contributions made by the state for individuals participating in the retirement system. The current maximum contribution from the state is set at 6% to 10%, depending on the system, and SJR60 proposes to raise it to a maximum of 11% for the Employees Retirement System and 10% for the Teacher Retirement System. This change is designed to bolster the financial stability of the retirement systems and ensure more sustainable benefits for state employees and teachers in Texas.

Contention

While the resolution aims to strengthen the retirement system, it may face scrutiny regarding its economic ramifications. Critics might raise concerns about the implications of increased state expenditures and how this could affect other budgetary allocations or tax policies. Proponents, however, would argue that ensuring adequate funding for the retirement system is a crucial investment in the state's workforce and will lead to improved retention and morale among public employees. As it stands, the proposal will be presented to voters in a future election, which could spark further debate on its merits.