Texas House Bill HCR183

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Instructing the enrolling clerk of the house to make corrections in H.B. No. 1755.

Impact

The impact of HCR183 is rather procedural, as it focuses on making technical corrections rather than introducing substantive changes to policy or law. By ensuring that laws are accurately codified, the resolution aids in maintaining a reliable legislative framework. Correcting such errors is vital as they can lead to misunderstandings and misapplications of the law. In this case, the corrections facilitate clearer communication regarding the responsibilities of the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles as specified in House Bill No. 1755.

Summary

HCR183 is a House Concurrent Resolution adopted by the Texas Legislature aimed at correcting technical errors found in House Bill No. 1755. The resolution instructs the enrolling clerk of the house to make specific changes to the enrolled version of the bill to ensure it accurately reflects legislative intent and conforms to required wording. The corrections primarily address language regarding the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles within the Transportation Code. This legislative process highlights the ongoing efforts to maintain clarity and precision in state laws.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR183 was largely positive, as it was adopted unanimously by both the House and the Senate, indicating a bipartisan agreement on the necessity of technical accuracy in legislation. The absence of opposition suggests that lawmakers recognize the importance of ensuring laws are free from errors that could hinder their implementation or enforcement. This resolution reflects a general consensus on the legislative process's integrity and the value placed on clear and precise legal language.

Contention

There were no notable points of contention in the discussions regarding HCR183. The resolution's unanimous passage (140-0 in the House and 31-0 in the Senate) suggests that lawmakers found the corrections to be non-controversial and necessary. This lack of debate illustrates that procedural resolutions intended for technical adjustments typically do not evoke significant controversy or opposition, as the focus remains on enhancing existing legislation's clarity and effectiveness.