Texas House Bill HB1826

Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Caption

Relating to the charging of exorbitant or excessive prices for disinfectant cleaning supplies or personal protective equipment during a declared disaster.

Impact

The legislation is designed to amend existing statutes regarding deceptive trade practices, specifically by including provisions that directly address the sale of essential goods during disasters. This will enhance consumer rights and potentially deter businesses from charging exorbitant prices when public demand for such items surges. The bill's implementation is expected to have a significant impact on consumer protection in Texas, providing legal grounds for enforcing fair pricing practices during emergencies.

Summary

House Bill 1826 aims to protect consumers from price gouging for essential items such as disinfectant cleaning supplies and personal protective equipment (PPE) during a declared disaster. The bill defines 'disinfectant cleaning supplies' and 'personal protective equipment' within the Business & Commerce Code, clarifying what items fall under this protection. By explicitly prohibiting excessive pricing during emergencies, it seeks to ensure that individuals in vulnerable situations have access to necessary supplies without being exploited financially.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1826 appears generally positive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and lawmakers concerned with public safety. Supporters argue that it is vital for protecting the public during times of crisis when essential items are scarce. However, there may also be concerns regarding the enforcement of such provisions and the potential burden it places on businesses that might struggle to adapt pricing models accordingly.

Contention

Key points of contention include the balance between protecting consumers and ensuring that businesses can operate effectively during emergencies. Skeptics of the bill may argue that while price regulation helps consumers, it could also lead to shortages if suppliers feel disincentivized to provide goods at lower profit margins. Furthermore, discussions may arise regarding the definitions of 'excessive prices' and the risk of government overreach into market practices.