Texas Senate Bill SB830

Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Caption

Relating to the procedure for amending or revoking certificates of public convenience and necessity issued to certain retail public utilities.

Impact

The amendments outlined in SB830 would directly affect the management and distribution of public utility services across Texas. Specifically, the bill would facilitate a more expedited process for municipalities seeking to change their utility service providers. This could empower local governments to respond more swiftly to the needs of their constituents, as they would have clearer paths to taking over utility operations when necessary. Additionally, the bill includes provisions for compensation to be paid to existing utility providers, which could help mitigate financial impacts during transitions.

Summary

SB830 proposes changes to the process by which certificates of public convenience and necessity are amended or revoked for certain retail public utilities in Texas. The bill introduces a more defined timeline for the utility commission to process petitions, specifying that the commission must grant a petition within 60 days if it deems it administratively complete unless there are explicit findings of failure to comply with required elements. This proposed timeline aims to streamline the approval process, potentially increasing the efficiency of utility service provision in municipalities.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB830 may arise from concerns about the balance of power between local municipalities and existing utility companies. Critics might argue that the bill could lead to hasty decisions by municipalities that do not fully consider the long-term implications for service quality and reliability. Industry stakeholders may express apprehension about the financial viability of utility companies if forced to concede territory or operations without adequate compensation, potentially jeopardizing their ability to maintain infrastructure and services already in place. The provisions for determining 'adequate and just compensation' could also become a contentious aspect during implementation.