Texas House Bill HB3647

Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Caption

Relating to placing a child in the possessory conservatorship of the child's parents in certain situations.

Impact

The implications of HB3647 on state laws are significant, as it modifies the existing framework governing child custody and placement reviews. Specifically, the bill mandates that the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) must evaluate whether a child can be returned to their parent after a set period and under the premise that the parent has rectified the circumstances that led to the original removal. This process aims to facilitate reunification and prevent unnecessary prolonged separations between parents and children, reflecting a shift towards more supportive measures for families within the child welfare system.

Summary

House Bill 3647 addresses the issue of child custody and the possibility of returning children to their parents' possession under certain conditions. The bill amends Section 263 of the Family Code, specifically adding a new section that outlines the procedures for reviewing a child's placement after removal from their parents. It focuses on ensuring that parents who have previously lost custody due to specific conditions are given opportunities for reunification, provided they meet certain criteria. This legislative change is intended to promote the best interests of the child and ensure that familial bonds are maintained whenever possible.

Contention

While the intent of HB3647 is to support family reunification, it is likely to engender discussion around the adequacy of resources and programs available for parents seeking to regain custody. Critics may point out that the bill could place additional pressure on the DFPS regarding the evaluations they must conduct, and there are concerns about whether the necessary support systems are in place to adequately assist parents. Additionally, the reliance on the child's best interest introduces a subjective element into the decision-making processes, which could lead to varied interpretations and outcomes depending on individual cases.