Texas Senate Bill SB84

Texas 2021 - 87th 2nd C.S.

Caption

Relating to approval of certain land development applications by a municipality or county.

Impact

The impact of SB84 on state laws is significant, as it modifies existing protocols governing land development. By restricting the authority of local governments to impose prerequisites, the bill promotes a unified approach to land development across Texas. This potentially reduces bureaucratic red tape, which proponents argue is essential for economic growth and development. However, the bill's enactment may also limit local control over land use and development practices, which could lead to friction between state and local authorities regarding land management and community standards.

Summary

Senate Bill 84 aims to streamline the approval process for land development applications by municipalities and counties in Texas. The bill introduces amendments to the Local Government Code, specifically Section 212.009 and Section 232.00285, that limit the powers of local planning commissions and commissioners courts. Under the new regulations, local authorities cannot impose prerequisites or conditions before a developer submits plans or applications, thereby expediting the approval process. This change intends to facilitate smoother and faster transitions from planning to development, addressing concerns that local practices may delay critical housing and infrastructure projects.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB84 involve the balance of power between state and local governance. Supporters claim that the bill will eliminate unnecessary delays, thereby fostering more robust economic development and addressing housing shortages. Conversely, opponents worry that restricting local authority undermines the specific needs and desires of communities. They argue that local governments should retain the ability to regulate land development to ensure that developments align with community values and standards. Therefore, the bill has sparked a broader discussion about local rights versus state-level efficiency in land use management.