Arkansas House Bill HB1096

Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/25
• Refer: 1/13/25
• Report Pass: 4/8/25
• Engrossed: 4/9/25
• Enrolled: 4/11/25
• Chaptered: 4/17/25
• Passed: 4/17/25

Caption

An Act For The Department Of Human Services - Medicaid Tobacco Settlement Program Appropriation For The 2025-2026 Fiscal Year.

Impact

The bill's passage will establish specific funding levels and personnel for the Medicaid Tobacco Settlement Program, which encompasses divisions responsible for medical services and behavioral health. By formalizing these appropriations, the act seeks to guarantee that key health services can be maintained despite potential fluctuations in funding sources. This initiative aims to address healthcare needs for vulnerable populations, particularly in areas related to aging and behavioral health.

Summary

House Bill 1096 is an appropriation act aimed at funding the Medicaid Tobacco Settlement Program in the State of Arkansas for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. The bill allocates a total of $145,569,113 for various medical services, which includes provisions for hospital services and prescription drugs. This act is crucial for ensuring that the programs funded by the proceeds from the tobacco settlement continue to operate effectively, providing essential health services to Arkansas residents.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1096 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among advocates for public health and human services. Legislators and stakeholders recognize the importance of maintaining funding for Medicaid, which plays a vital role in providing crucial health services. The unanimous vote of 34-0 in favor of the bill during its third reading highlights a strong bipartisan agreement on the necessity of the funds allocated by this legislation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns related to the sustainability of funding, especially given language in the bill that specifies state funds will not replace tobacco settlement funds should they become insufficient. This raises questions about the long-term viability of services relying on these appropriations, particularly if tobacco settlement revenues decline. Critics may argue that a reliance on such funding models perpetuates vulnerability in important health service delivery.