Oklahoma Senate Bill SB648

Oklahoma 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/25
• Refer: 2/4/25

Caption

Oklahoma Floodplain Management Act; allowing for compensation of certain board members. Effective date.

Impact

The bill's impact lies in the potential increase in engagement and effectiveness of local floodplain management efforts. By compensating board members, the state seeks to attract qualified individuals who may be more willing to serve if there is financial support. This development aligns with overarching objectives to improve floodplain management practices across Oklahoma, thereby possibly contributing to enhanced community safety, better disaster preparedness, and improved land-use planning efforts in flood-prone areas.

Summary

Senate Bill 648 amends aspects of the Oklahoma Floodplain Management Act, specifically Section 1605 of Title 82 of the Oklahoma Statutes. The bill facilitates the establishment of compensation for members of county and municipal floodplain boards, allowing them to receive up to $125 per meeting for their service. This change aims to enhance participation in local flood management efforts by providing financial incentives to board members, who are primarily residents of the respective counties or municipalities and possess real property within unincorporated areas or municipalities. They may also receive reimbursement for expenses incurred while performing their duties, in accordance with the State Travel Reimbursement Act.

Contention

While the bill presents several advantages, there may be varying opinions regarding its implications. Some may argue that it sets a precedent for compensating local board members, which could lead to concerns about funding allocations and budgeting within local governments. Furthermore, discussions may arise regarding the adequacy of compensation in relation to the responsibilities and time commitments required of board members. Overall, the act represents a shift that could foster a more engaged public sector in floodplain management, though it could also incite debates surrounding fiscal responsibility and local governance.