Indiana 2025 Regular Session

Indiana House Bill HB1601

Introduced
1/21/25  
Refer
1/21/25  
Report Pass
2/13/25  
Engrossed
2/19/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Enrolled
4/16/25  
Passed
5/1/25  
Chaptered
5/1/25  

Caption

Quantum research tax incentives.

Impact

Should HB 1601 be enacted, its provisions could significantly shift Indiana's state law regarding property taxation and create more favorable conditions for technological growth. The bill allows for property tax exemptions specifically targeting qualified equipment and facilities associated with advanced computing and quantum research initiatives. By doing so, it encourages increased investment in sectors that are expected to play major roles in future technological advancements. The fiscal impact is projected to enhance job creation and economic growth as businesses respond to these incentives.

Summary

House Bill 1601 focuses on enhancing Indiana's economic development through incentives for businesses investing in quantum computing and data centers. Specifically, it provides tax incentives for qualified entities that invest significantly in infrastructure related to quantum computing research, advanced computing, as well as defense infrastructure networks. This bill aims to establish Indiana as a competitive leader in these sectors by attracting necessary financial investments and innovative projects to the state. The legislation outlines criteria for eligibility, including minimum investment levels and workforce wage requirements to qualify for incentive programs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1601 is marked by optimism among proponents who see the bill as an essential catalyst for economic growth and job creation in Indiana's emerging tech industries. Advocates argue that the incentives are necessary to level the playing field against other states actively courting the tech sector. Conversely, there are concerns raised by some critics about potential risks associated with large tax breaks and the long-term sustainability of such incentives without clear accountability measures in place.

Contention

Debates around HB 1601 have highlighted some contentious points, notably the balance between offering substantial tax incentives and ensuring that they do not adversely affect state revenue in the long term. Some stakeholders are concerned about whether the expected economic benefits will truly materialize and how the proposed incentives align with the state’s existing fiscal policies. Additionally, discussions have noted the importance of ensuring that investments also translate to real community benefits, such as good-paying jobs and enhanced local economies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

IN SB0260

Neighborhood and individual development incentives.

IN SB0127

Economic development incentive accountability.

IN SB0210

Property taxes and sales and use taxes.

IN SB0419

State tax matters.

IN SB0417

Various tax matters.

IN SB0228

Various tax matters.

IN HB1499

Various tax matters.

IN SB0434

Economic development in Lake County.

IN SB0381

Sales tax on recreational vehicles.

IN HB1454

Department of local government finance.

Similar Bills

TX HB5092

Relating to the operation and dissolution of the Lubbock Reese Redevelopment Authority and to agreements between Texas Tech University and the authority.

TX SB2694

Relating to the operation and dissolution of the Lubbock Reese Redevelopment Authority and to agreements between Texas Tech University and the authority.

OH HB349

Authorize creation of natural gas pipeline incentive areas

KY HB315

AN ACT relating to broadband deployment, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.

IN SB0272

Wastewater infrastructure.

KY SB229

AN ACT relating to municipal utilities.

AZ SB1091

Appropriation; debt; repayment; defeasance

CA AB444

California Defense Community Infrastructure Program.