Nuclear Waste Informed Consent ActThis bill prohibits the Department of Energy (DOE) from using the Nuclear Waste Fund for certain activities related to radioactive waste disposal unless DOE has entered into a written agreement for a repository with (1) the governor of the state in which the proposed repository will be located, (2) affected local governments, (3) local governments contiguous to the affected local governments if spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste will be transported through them for disposal at the repository, and (4) affected Indian tribes.
Impact
If enacted, HB 466 would significantly alter the process by which nuclear waste repositories are established and funded. By requiring written agreements with the governor of the state, affected local governments, and any relevant Indian tribes, the bill aims to provide a framework for consent that could slow down the pace of decision-making, but also ensures community involvement. This legislative requirement adds a layer of accountability in the management of high-level radioactive waste, which has been a contentious issue in localities near proposed sites for nuclear waste disposal.
Summary
House Bill 466, known as the Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act, mandates that the Secretary of Energy must obtain consent from impacted state and local governments prior to making expenditures from the Nuclear Waste Fund for constructing a nuclear waste repository. This bill emphasizes a more inclusive approach to decision-making in matters involving nuclear waste disposal, ensuring that local entities are consulted and their agreements are secured before any actions are taken that could influence their communities.
Contention
A notable point of contention surrounding HB 466 involves the balance between federal oversight and local governance. Proponents argue that involving local governments and tribes promotes transparency and community engagement, fostering trust in nuclear waste management practices. Conversely, critics may contend that this could lead to excessive delays in establishing necessary facilities, complicating what is already a difficult and prolonged process of managing nuclear waste effectively. The bill could create a patchwork of local regulations that might vary widely from one jurisdiction to another, potentially complicating nationally coordinated efforts to handle nuclear waste.
Identical bill
Nuclear Waste Informed Consent ActThis bill prohibits the Department of Energy (DOE) from using the Nuclear Waste Fund for certain activities related to radioactive waste disposal unless DOE has entered into a written agreement for a repository with (1) the governor of the state in which the proposed repository will be located, (2) affected local governments, (3) local governments contiguous to the affected local governments if spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste will be transported through them for disposal at the repository, and (4) affected Indian tribes.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President and the Secretary of State should ensure that the Government of Canada does not permanently store nuclear waste in the Great Lakes Basin.
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the President and the Secretary of State should ensure that the Government of Canada does not permanently store nuclear waste in the Great Lakes Basin.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States should support the expansion of domestic nuclear energy and advanced nuclear technology as a viable source of power in order to promote United States nuclear energy leadership and global energy independence.