Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2370

Introduced
1/21/25  
Report Pass
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/10/25  
Engrossed
2/18/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  

Caption

Entrance fee; refunds; time frame

Impact

If enacted, HB2370 will significantly affect how life care providers manage entrance fees in Arizona. By imposing the requirement to maintain escrow accounts, the legislation seeks to prevent providers from misusing funds collected from prospective residents. This leads to enhanced consumer protections within the life care industry. Furthermore, the bill includes specifications regarding the timely return of refundable entrance fees, which can improve the overall transparency and reliability of life care contracts for both providers and residents.

Summary

House Bill 2370 proposes amendments to section 20-1804 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, specifically addressing life care contracts and the management of entrance fees in escrow accounts. The bill mandates that entrance fees collected by providers be held in escrow until certain conditions are met, ensuring that funds are safeguarded until a resident is permitted to occupy their living unit or start receiving services. This amendment aims to provide greater financial protection for individuals entering life care contracts, establishing clearer rules for the handling and refund of entrance fees.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB2370 appears to be supportive, particularly from consumer protection advocates who view the bill as a necessary step to strengthen safeguards for vulnerable individuals entering life care arrangements. However, some providers may express concerns regarding potential additional administrative burdens or costs associated with maintaining escrow accounts and complying with the new regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill relate mainly to the administrative responsibilities it places on life care providers. Some stakeholders argue that the escrow requirements may complicate financial operations and delay the use of entrance fees for legitimate expenses. The debate often centers on finding a balance between ensuring resident protection and allowing providers the flexibility to manage their finances effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A2517

Prohibits employment of illegal aliens and requires use of E-Verify program in public contracts.

CA AB948

School facilities: task-order procurement contracting.

CA AB506

Contracts: sales of dogs and cats.

NJ S3849

Increases certain local public contract bid threshold.

NJ S1385

Establishes four-year pilot program in Ocean County for electronic monitoring of certain domestic violence offenders; appropriates $2.5 million.

NJ A5514

Requires municipalities and counties to utilize cost-saving practices under cooperative purchasing systems when procuring energy-related goods and services.

NJ A5505

Directs ELEC to raise value threshold of pay-to-play prohibition for certain State, county, municipal, school board, and fire district contracts to align with threshold for awarding certain public contracts utilizing qualified purchasing agent.

NJ S4277

Directs ELEC to raise value threshold of pay-to-play prohibition for certain State, county, municipal, school board, and fire district contracts to align with threshold for awarding certain public contracts utilizing qualified purchasing agent.