Adopt the Asbestos Trust Claims Transparency Act and the Asbestos Claims Priorities and Over-Naming Reform Act
Impact
The introduction of LB340 is poised to impact state laws governing asbestos claims by establishing clearer protocols and procedures. Specifically, it mandates that any party seeking to file a claim must disclose their claim submission history and any prior settlements. This could lead to more informed decision-making by claimants and potentially expedite the claims process. Furthermore, the bill seeks to rectify perceived inconsistencies in how asbestos trust claims are prioritized, which could change the financial landscape for victims dependent on these funds for compensation.
Summary
LB340, also known as the Asbestos Trust Claims Transparency Act and the Asbestos Claims Priorities and Over-Naming Reform Act, aims to introduce significant changes in the handling of asbestos-related claims. This bill is designed to enhance transparency regarding the claims brought against asbestos trusts and ensure that the priority of claims is clearly defined. It is a response to concerns that current processes do not adequately inform injured parties about the status of the funds and claims associated with asbestos exposure. The intent of this legislation is to streamline the claims process and make it more efficient for those affected by asbestos-related diseases.
Contention
Notably, there has been some debate surrounding LB340 regarding its implementation and the potential implications it could have on the access to justice for asbestos victims. While proponents argue that increased transparency will benefit claimants by providing them with the necessary information to navigate the claims process successfully, critics raise concerns that these changes might create additional barriers for those seeking compensation. The concern is that by enforcing stricter requirements concerning previous claims and settlements, some valid claims may be inadvertently sidelined or become more complicated to pursue.
Adopt the State and Political Subdivisions Child Sexual Abuse Liability Act and exempt actions from the State Tort Claims Act and Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act
Interim study to examine the frequency of claims brought under the Political Subdivisions Torts Claims Act and the State Tort Claims Act and the frequency of tort claims brought against other states
Change provisions of the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act and the State Tort Claims Act to allow certain claims by prisoners, detainees, and children in the custody, care, or control of a government entity
Allow claims involving death, child abuse, or sexual assault of a child under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act and State Tort Claims Act and change provisions of the Consumer Protection Act and Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act relating to civil penalties