Proposing a constitutional amendment to repeal the constitutional provision providing that marriage in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman and prohibiting this state or a political subdivision of this state from creating or recognizing any legal status identical or similar to marriage, and to change certain terminology used to refer to the parties to a marriage.
If enacted, SJR35 would align Texas law with a growing shift towards marriage equality observed in many other states and at the federal level. This change would not only impact the recognition of marriage status for same-sex couples but also potentially affect other areas, such as inheritance rights, taxation, and benefits that are contingent on marital status. The amendment is set to be submitted for voter approval in November 2025, which means it requires public backing to be enacted, highlighting the democratic process involved in effecting such constitutional changes.
SJR35 proposes a significant change to the Texas Constitution by repealing the provision that defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This constitutional amendment aims to acknowledge and standardize the legal recognition of marriage equality within the state. By removing the existing clause, the bill seeks to dismantle barriers that prevent same-sex couples from being recognized under state law in the same manner as heterosexual couples. The proposal also includes amendments to related terminology concerning the parties involved in a marriage, which reflects a broader acceptance of diverse relationships.
The proposal is likely to generate significant debate, with supporters advocating for equal rights and recognition of all marriages, while opponents may argue against the repeal based on traditional views of marriage. These discussions often reflect broader societal divides over LGBTQ+ rights and can impact local and state-level political dynamics. The potential removal of the marriage definition may encounter resistance from conservative groups who see it as a fundamental alteration of social norms within Texas, indicating that public opinion and campaigning could play pivotal roles leading up to the vote.