Elections; notary public restrictions; log requirements; exceptions; penalties; effective date.
Impact
The amendments proposed by HB 2191 will significantly affect how absentee ballot processes are handled within the state. By imposing stricter guidelines on notaries, it aims to prevent fraudulent activities related to absentee voting while ensuring transparency through the maintenance of public logs. Notaries will be required to keep detailed records of their notarization activities for a minimum of two years, which will be accessible to election boards, contributing to the integrity and accountability of the election process.
Summary
House Bill 2191 proposes amendments to election regulations in Oklahoma specifically related to notary public activities concerning absentee ballots. The bill seeks to clarify restrictions prohibiting notaries and their agents from engaging in several activities related to absentee ballots, such as requesting, receiving, or submitting absentee ballots on behalf of others, except for their own household members. It establishes stringent penalties for notaries who violate these rules, including the potential for revocation of their notary appointment and fines for willful misconduct.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment around HB 2191 appears to be supportive among proponents who argue that enhancing the regulatory framework for absentee votes will enhance election security. However, there may be concerns expressed by some civil rights advocates who fear that such restrictions could disenfranchise voters, particularly those who rely on assistance for the absentee voting process. This division indicates an ongoing debate regarding election integrity versus access to voting.
Contention
Noteworthy points of contention surrounding HB 2191 include the potential implications for voter accessibility. Critics may argue that the bill may impose undue burdens on certain segments of the population who depend on notaries for assistance with absentee ballots, raising issues about equitable access to voting. Additionally, the penalties for non-compliance could be viewed as excessively punitive, particularly the revocation period for notary appointments, which proponents may see as necessary enforcement but opponents could see as threatening to legitimate and helpful notary activities in the community.
Elections; creating the Election Notary Accountability Act; requiring notary public to submit copy of log to county election board within certain time period. Effective date.
Elections; creating the Election Notary Accountability Act; requiring notary public to submit copy of log to county election board within certain time period. Effective date.
Open Meeting Act; public body notices; online publishing requirements; COVID-19 expired notice exceptions; modifying provisions related to publishing notice and agendas online; effective date.
Elections; providing time limit for resubmission of canceled registration; authorizing printing of additional ballots in certain circumstances; prohibiting vote centers on election day; effective date; emergency.
Elections; providing time limit for resubmission of canceled registration; authorizing printing of additional ballots in certain circumstances; prohibiting vote centers on election day; effective date; emergency.