Iowa Senate Bill SSB1022

Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/25
• Refer: 1/21/25

Caption

A bill for an act modifying provisions related to shared operational functions and school district supplementary weighting.(See SF 168.)

Impact

Currently, the supplementary weighting system allows school districts that share certain operational functions with political subdivisions to receive funding for these services. The changes introduced by SSB1022 would ensure that effective programs aimed at mental well-being and resource provision, such as those involving master social workers and school resource officers, are adequately funded. The bill indicates that starting from the 2025 budget year, the weighting associated with these shared functions will not contribute to the maximum allowable supplementary weighting, potentially increasing the funding available for school districts engaging in these critical services.

Summary

Senate Study Bill 1022 proposes modifications to the provisions related to shared operational functions and supplementary weighting for school districts in Iowa. The bill aims to enhance educational resources by providing additional funding to school districts that engage in shared operational functions. Specifically, it allows for supplementary weighting to be assigned for specific functions related to social work and mental health services, which are crucial for addressing the students' diverse needs. This additional funding will redirect resources to improve student opportunities and enhance programming in schools across the state.

Contention

The bill's modifications may generate discussion regarding the adequacy and equity of funding in educational systems, especially for districts that might struggle to share operational functions. Some stakeholders may express concerns about the long-term sustainability of such funding if districts are reliant on shared services. Furthermore, the proposal raises questions among legislators about the potential implications for school districts that do not have the resources or partnerships to avail themselves of the supplementary weighting advantages. Balancing resource allocation between wealthier districts with access to partnerships and those without may become a contentious issue.