Tennessee Senate Bill SB0252

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/25
• Engrossed: 2/24/25
• Enrolled: 4/21/25
• Passed: 5/2/25
• Chaptered: 5/13/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 29-13-106, relative to criminal injuries compensation.

Impact

The implications of SB0252 are significant for the compensation awarded to victims of crimes in Tennessee. By benchmarking against other jurisdictions, the bill aims to ensure that the state remains a viable option for victims seeking reparation. The requirement of legislative oversight on any reductions in compensation awards provides a form of protection for victims, ensuring that their potential compensation does not diminish without broader consent from elected officials. This could enhance the trust in the state's support mechanisms for victims of crime and foster a more equitable compensation environment.

Summary

Senate Bill 252 (SB0252) aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Section 29-13-106, regarding criminal injuries compensation. The bill seeks to establish a maximum compensation award based on a percentage (105%) of the national average for such awards across all states, territories, and the District of Columbia. This adjustment is set to occur annually, ensuring that Tennessee's compensation limits remain competitive and reflective of national standards, while also stipulating that any decrease in such awards requires approval from key legislative figures before publication.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB0252 is generally positive among proponents who advocate for improved victim support systems. They view the bill as a necessary step toward establishing fair compensation practices that align more closely with national standards. However, any concerns regarding bureaucratic oversight and the potential for delays in compensation adjustments could spark debate. Some stakeholders may also express apprehension over reliance on national averages, fearing that local needs might be overshadowed by broader metrics.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB0252 include the implications of annual adjustments and the requirement for approval from legislative leaders for reductions in compensation limits. Critics may argue that this could lead to increased political influence over victim compensation matters and potentially hinder timely adjustments in line with evolving circumstances. Moreover, questions about the adequacy of the compensation amounts, compared to the real needs of victims, could become focal points in discussions as the bill moves forward.