The bill is intended to streamline the process involved in tax deed sales and clarify the distribution of the proceeds from these sales. By specifying how surplus proceeds should be handled, the bill ensures that any funds remaining after payment of taxes, penalties, and other costs are returned to the previous owner of record, or transferred to the Unclaimed Property Division if the prior owner cannot be located. This change is designed to promote fairness in property taxation and convey a greater degree of certainty regarding financial transactions related to tax-delinquent properties.
Summary
Senate Bill 90 aims to clarify and amend existing provisions regarding tax deeds in South Dakota. One of the primary changes proposed by the bill is to ensure that any deed acquired through tax deed procedures vests the grantee with an absolute estate in fee simple, while still recognizing that the real property is subject to any claims for taxes, liens, or encumbrances held by the state or county. This clarification seeks to solidify the rights of the deed holder concerning possession of the property, regardless of any redemption rights that may exist for prior owners.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment around SB90 appears to lean towards support from legislators who prioritize clarity and efficiency in property tax procedures. Proponents likely see this bill as a necessary reform that enhances legal transparency and protects the rights of both property owners and municipalities. However, there may be concerns from advocates focused on the implications of tax enforcement practices and the potential impacts on vulnerable property owners who might struggle with tax payments.
Contention
While detailed discussions regarding points of contention have not been highlighted in the materials, potential areas of dispute could arise around the interpretation of what constitutes 'due process' for property owners facing tax deeds. Critics may argue that consolidation of power in tax enforcement could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who might be less able to navigate the tax system effectively. The bill's amendments to existing laws could create tension between municipalities seeking revenue and residents appealing to local government for relief.