AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 24; Title 25; Title 26; Title 27; Title 28; Title 29; Title 30; Title 31; Title 32; Title 34; Title 35 and Title 36, relative to civil justice.
Impact
The implications of SB0272 could be substantial within the realm of civil justice in Tennessee. By extending the response time in litigation processes, the bill may facilitate more thorough case preparation and improve the quality of legal representation for parties involved in disputes. This change could, in theory, lead to a more equitable legal environment where parties are less rushed in navigating legal complexities. However, it may also result in increased court delays as the longer timelines could be adopted across the board, affecting the overall efficiency of the judicial system.
Summary
Senate Bill 272 seeks to amend various titles within the Tennessee Code Annotated concerning civil justice. A significant change proposed in this bill is the extension of the time frame from sixty days to ninety days for certain procedural actions within civil litigation. This adjustment is aimed at providing more time for parties to respond and prepare their cases, potentially reducing the pressure associated with tight deadlines in legal proceedings.
Sentiment
Sentiment surrounding SB0272 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among legal practitioners and civil rights advocates who see merit in providing litigants with adequate time to engage with the judicial process. However, some concerns have been expressed regarding the potential for prolonged litigation as a result of the amendments, which may draw opposition from individuals and entities concerned about the prompt resolution of legal disputes. Overall, a balance is sought between the need for thoroughness and the necessity of judicial efficiency.
Contention
Notably, the bill's provisions underline a larger debate regarding the balance between accessibility and efficiency in the legal system. Critics contend that while providing additional time might benefit individuals who require more preparation, it could hinder the judicial process by allowing cases to linger longer than necessary. The contention around the legislation reflects deeper issues within the civil justice framework, including the challenges of managing caseloads and ensuring timely access to justice.
Crossfiled
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 24; Title 25; Title 26; Title 27; Title 28; Title 29; Title 30; Title 31; Title 32; Title 34; Title 35 and Title 36, relative to civil justice.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 30; Title 31; Title 32; Title 34; Title 35; Title 36; Title 39 and Title 71, relative to elderly and vulnerable adults.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 30; Title 31; Title 32; Title 34; Title 35; Title 36; Title 39 and Title 71, relative to elderly and vulnerable adults.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 20; Title 24; Title 26; Title 29; Title 36; Title 37; Title 38; Title 40; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to children.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 20; Title 24; Title 26; Title 29; Title 36; Title 37; Title 38; Title 40; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to children.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 27; Title 29; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 41 and Title 55, relative to criminal justice.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 27; Title 29; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 41 and Title 55, relative to criminal justice.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 28; Title 29; Title 33; Title 34; Title 36; Title 37; Title 39; Title 40; Title 49; Title 56; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to treatment of minors.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 28; Title 29; Title 33; Title 34; Title 36; Title 37; Title 39; Title 40; Title 49; Title 56; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to treatment of minors.