Relating to the use of direct recording electronic voting machines.
Impact
The implementation of HB 638 would modernize voting technology standards across Texas by establishing new requirements for electronic voting systems. Systems that do not comply with the new paper audit trail requirement, unless exempted under specific conditions, would no longer be eligible for use in elections. This legislative change would replace older voting methods and reinforce the expectation of a secure and auditable election process, driven by voter confidence in the integrity of the voting system. The bill also stipulates additional regulatory measures, including the submission of security plans to the state secretary ahead of elections, enhancing operational oversight.
Summary
House Bill 638 proposes significant amendments to the Texas Election Code, specifically regarding the use of direct recording electronic voting machines. The bill mandates that any voting system utilizing such machines must create a contemporaneous auditable paper record copy of each electronic ballot. This requirement aims to enhance accountability and transparency in the voting process, allowing voters to visually verify their choices before their votes are officially recorded. The bill intends to protect the integrity of elections by providing a tangible audit trail that can be reviewed in case of disputes or recounts.
Contention
While the bill is designed to bolster voting security, there could be points of contention underlying its provisions. Critics may argue that the costs associated with upgrading or replacing existing voting technology could pose a burden on counties with limited budgets. Moreover, implementing the paper audit trail requirement might introduce new logistical challenges for election officials. Some stakeholders could express concerns about the efficacy of electronic systems versus traditional paper ballots, leading to debates on the best practices for ensuring fair elections, particularly within communities that have historically relied on electronic voting technology.
Relating to election integrity and security, including by preventing fraud in the conduct of elections in this state; authorizing a penalty, increasing a penalty.
Relating to appointment of and performance of notarial acts by an online notary public and online acknowledgment and proof of written instruments; authorizing a fee and creating a criminal offense.