Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB677

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
4/15/09  
Voted on by House
4/29/09  
Out of Senate Committee
5/23/09  
Voted on by Senate
5/26/09  
Governor Action
6/19/09  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Refer
5/4/09  
Report Pass
5/23/09  
Enrolled
5/31/09  

Caption

Relating to violations of laws administered and enforced by the Texas Ethics Commission and to sworn complaints alleging such violations.

Impact

The introduction of HB 677 is likely to have several implications for political processes and the enforcement of ethical standards within Texas elections. By imposing liability for complainants who file unsuccessful complaints, the bill aims to deter frivolous claims that could otherwise disrupt candidates' campaigns in the crucial days leading up to an election. Supporters of the bill argue that it protects candidates and committees from potentially costly legal battles initiated by unfounded accusations, thus allowing them to focus on their campaign efforts rather than defensive legal strategies.

Summary

House Bill 677 is a legislative proposal that addresses the liability concerning attorney's fees and costs for respondents who are defending against sworn complaints filed with the Texas Ethics Commission. The bill specifically applies to complaints lodged within 60 days prior to an election and focuses on candidates, specific-purpose committees, or their campaign treasurers that are specifically involved in the election. The key provision of this bill stipulates that if the commission finds no violation occurred, the complainant will be held responsible for covering the legal costs incurred by the respondent in the complaint defense process.

Contention

However, there are notable points of contention surrounding this bill. Critics may argue that implementing such liability could inhibit genuine reports of misconduct, as potential complainants may fear financial repercussions should their complaints not be upheld. This concern raises questions about the balance between protecting individuals from harassment during elections and ensuring that valid complaints can be made without risk of punitive costs. Furthermore, opponents could voice a concern that this bill disproportionately favors those with resources to absorb legal costs, thereby marginalizing smaller candidates or less well-funded political entities who might be adversely affected by such legal dynamics.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX SB320

Relating to complaints filed with the Texas Ethics Commission.

TX HB1530

Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement.

TX SB1445

Relating to the continuation and functions of the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement; authorizing a fee.

TX HB1585

Relating to matters affecting the powers and duties of the Texas Ethics Commission.

TX HB4489

Relating to air quality complaints concerning and violations for odors emanating from poultry facilities.

TX SB2494

Relating to establishing election marshals and enforcing violations of elections law.

TX SB2495

Relating to establishing election marshals and enforcing violations of elections law.

TX SB219

Relating to the powers and duties of the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement and law enforcement agencies regarding law enforcement officers and the use of body worn cameras; authorizing fees.

TX HB138

Relating to the enforcement within this state of certain federal laws regarding immigration.

TX SB471

Relating to the investigation by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality of certain complaints.

Similar Bills

CA AB2713

Public employment: sexual harassment tracking.

CA SB820

Cannabis: enforcement: seizure of property.

CA SB1485

Consumer complaints.

CA SB342

Misleading advertising: domain and subdomain names.

CA AB2948

Consumer protection: Department of Consumer Affairs: complaints.

CA AB424

Alcohol and other drug programs: complaints.

CA AB1679

Motor vehicle insurance: auto body repair.

HI HB165

Relating To Internal Complaint Procedures.