Michigan House Bill HB4024

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/28/25
• Refer: 1/28/25
• Report Pass: 8/27/25
• Engrossed: 9/4/25
• Refer: 9/9/25

Caption

Civil rights: privacy; restriction of student access to certain restrooms and changing areas based on biological sex; provide for. Creates new act.

Impact

The enactment of HB 4024 would significantly change the operational policies of educational institutions concerning restroom and changing area access. By defining usage based on biological sex, the bill could potentially limit the access of transgender students or those who do not conform to traditional gender roles, creating an environment of uncertainty and tension for those students. Additionally, educational institutions would have to navigate the implications of this bill on their existing policies regarding inclusivity and discrimination.

Summary

House Bill 4024, known as the 'Student Restroom Privacy Act', seeks to regulate the use of multiple-occupancy restrooms and changing areas in educational institutions based on students' biological sex as recorded on their birth certificates. The bill mandates that all such facilities be designated for use according to sex, reinforcing traditional definitions of gender within educational settings. This legislation applies to a wide range of institutions, including public schools, colleges, and vocational schools that receive state funding.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 4024 is largely polarized. Supporters argue that the bill is essential for protecting student privacy and maintaining a safe environment for all students in vulnerable situations, such as changing or using restrooms. On the other hand, detractors contend that the bill discriminates against transgender individuals and threatens the mental health and well-being of students who might feel marginalized as a result of such policies. The discourse around this bill reflects broader societal debates on gender identity and rights.

Contention

Significant contention arises from the implications of defining restroom access strictly by biological sex. Critics argue that this approach eliminates the necessary flexibility to accommodate students' diverse identities and needs, undermining principles of equality and non-discrimination. Furthermore, the bill draws criticism regarding its enforcement mechanisms and the potential stigmatization of students affected by these regulations. As the bill progresses, it will likely face increased scrutiny and opposition from civil rights groups concerned about its impact on student welfare.