Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB938

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the admissibility of certain confessions in capital cases.

Impact

The changes proposed in HB 938 aim to strengthen the procedural safeguards surrounding confessions in capital cases, ensuring that statements are admissible only when they comply with rigorous recording standards. The requirement for motion picture or visual recordings is notably stricter than the provisions for non-capital offenses, where audio recordings may suffice. This distinction underlines the grave nature of capital charges and the necessity for meticulous documentation to preserve the defendants' rights. Consequently, law enforcement agencies may face increased operational demands to comply with the new standards.

Summary

House Bill 938 seeks to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure relating to the admissibility of certain confessions in capital cases. The focus of this bill is to require that any oral or sign language statements made by an accused during custodial interrogation must be electronically recorded in a format that is consistent for capital offenses. The recording must not only show the statements made by the accused but also encompass specific procedures that ensure the integrity and authenticity of the evidence gathered during such interrogations. This raises significant implications for how law enforcement agencies handle interrogations in capital cases.

Contention

While supporters argue that this bill enhances the integrity of the criminal justice process and protects the rights of those accused of serious crimes, there may be concerns regarding the practical implications. Opponents could raise questions about the feasibility and costs related to the implementation of more stringent recording requirements. Moreover, there may be anxiety that these changes could inadvertently impact law enforcement's ability to effectively carry out investigations. Ultimately, the bill could spark dialogues over the balance between ensuring fair trial rights and the operational needs of law enforcement.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX SB2563

Relating to the admissibility of certain evidence against a defendant in a criminal case.

TX HB3400

Relating to the release of defendants on bail, the duties of a magistrate in certain criminal proceedings, and the appointment of certain criminal law hearing officers; creating a criminal offense.

TX HB4504

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, including conforming amendments.

TX HB1170

Relating to policies and standards for providing legal representation to indigent defendants in certain capital felony cases.

TX HB828

Relating to the age of criminal responsibility and to certain substantive and procedural matters related to that age.

TX SB1318

Relating to the release of defendants on bail, the duties of a magistrate in certain criminal proceedings, and the notice provided by peace officers to adult victims of family violence.

TX HB405

Relating to the appearance of an arrested person before a magistrate and to the retention of certain related records.

TX HB501

Relating to the age of criminal responsibility and to certain substantive and procedural matters related to that age.

TX HB1528

Relating to magistration proceedings for criminal defendants and the retention of related records, to services and representation provided to indigent criminal defendants and indigent juveniles, and to the governance and administration of the Texas Indigent Defense Commission.

TX HB1975

Relating to increasing the criminal penalties for certain repeat sex offenders and to the admissibility of evidence of certain extraneous offenses or acts in the prosecution of certain sexual and assaultive offenses.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.