Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1424

Introduced
2/3/25  
Report Pass
2/13/25  
Report Pass
2/24/25  
Engrossed
2/27/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Enrolled
4/15/25  
Passed
4/18/25  
Chaptered
4/18/25  

Caption

Impersonation; veteran; armed forces

Impact

The bill proposes a classification of punishable actions related to impersonating a veteran, establishing it as a class 1 misdemeanor. However, if the impersonation results in receiving benefits valued at $50,000 or more, it escalates to a class 6 felony. This progressive penalization reflects lawmakers' intent to deter fraudulent behavior while also underscoring the seriousness of the offense against those who have served the nation. Additionally, the act includes provisions for disqualification from public office for those convicted under its terms, emphasizing accountability and integrity within public service roles.

Summary

Senate Bill 1424, also known as the Master Sergeant Orlando Dona Valor Act, aims to establish penalties for individuals who impersonate veterans of the United States armed forces. The bill specifically addresses situations where non-veterans misrepresent themselves as veterans to obtain financial benefits or other tangible advantages. This includes false claims about military service, decorations, educational achievements from military academies, or combat experience, among others. The implications of this legislation are significant, as it seeks to protect the integrity of veteran status, preventing fraud and ensuring that benefits are reserved for those who have legitimately served in the military.

Sentiment

The reception of SB1424 appears to be generally positive among legislators, with a wide majority voting in favor of its provisions. Supporters argue that the legislation is critical for protecting veterans' honor and ensuring that the benefits meant for them are not misappropriated by individuals posing as service members. However, conversations around the bill do hint at underlying tensions regarding the balance between enforcement of these measures and the rights of individuals, particularly in terms of the defense available to those accused of impersonation.

Contention

While most discussions have favored the bill's intent, there has been some contention about the definitions used within the legislation, particularly regarding what constitutes valid military service and the requirements for evidence in prosecutions. Legislators must ensure that the criteria for classifying an impersonation offense do not inadvertently lead to wrongful accusations against individuals, especially those who may have legitimate reasons to reference military service. Overall, the bill aims to create a legally defined framework to address impersonation, which continues to be a concern in public discourse.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AZ HB2671

Armed forces; definition; veterans' services

AZ HB2670

State agencies; veterans status; inquiry

AZ HB2394

Digital impersonation; injunctive relief; requirements

AZ SB1685

Veterans' donations fund; grants

AZ HB2331

Veteran community enhancement special plates

AZ SB1113

Property tax exemption; veterans

AZ HB2390

Property tax exemption; combat veterans

AZ HB2603

Native American veteran special plates

AZ HB2089

Military veterans; surviving spouses; scholarships

AZ HB2311

Schools; enrollment preference; armed forces

Similar Bills

NJ A473

Upgrades certain crimes of misrepresenting oneself as member or veteran of US Armed Forces or organized militia.

CA AB153

Military fraud.

CA AB2193

Military: State Guard.

NJ A748

Increases penalties for identity theft when victim is a senior citizen or veteran.

NJ S1888

Increases penalties for identity theft when victim is a senior citizen or veteran.

NJ S165

Increases penalties for identity theft when victim is a senior citizen or veteran.

NJ A1749

Increases penalties for identity theft when victim is a senior citizen or veteran.

CA SB401

Psychology: unprofessional conduct: disciplinary action: sexual acts.