Iowa House Bill HJR3

Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/25
• Refer: 1/30/25

Caption

A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to the right of the people to a clean environment.

Impact

If adopted, HJR3 would introduce a significant shift in the legal framework concerning environmental rights in Iowa. The proposed amendment aims to ensure that any infringements upon these environmental rights would undergo strict scrutiny by the state. This could potentially influence how environmental regulations are enacted and enforced, reinforcing a stronger legal standing for citizens to challenge actions that degrade the environment. It also signifies a clear recognition of the connection between public health and environmental quality, potentially leading to more profound state commitments to environmental protection.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 3 (HJR3) proposes an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa, establishing a right for individuals to enjoy a clean and healthy environment. This amendment highlights the importance of pure water, clean air, a stable climate, and ecologically healthy habitats as fundamental rights. Furthermore, it emphasizes that the state's public natural resources, including its soils, waters, air, flora, and fauna, are considered common property of all people, encompassing both current and future generations. This advocates for a trusteeship model, placing responsibility on the state to conserve and restore these vital resources for the benefit of its citizens.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HJR3 may involve varying perspectives on environmental regulation and the state's role in safeguarding natural resources. Proponents might argue that establishing these rights will lead to more robust protections for the environment and public health, empowering citizens to enforce environmental standards. Conversely, critics may express concerns about the implications of such constitutional provision on business regulations and property rights, fearing that it might lead to increased litigation and government intervention in private affairs. The introduction of such a constitutional amendment could certainly ignite a debate over the balance between individual rights, environmental stewardship, and economic development.