California Assembly Bill AB367

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/25
• Refer: 3/28/25
• Report Pass: 3/28/25
• Refer: 4/1/25
• Report Pass: 4/8/25
• Refer: 4/8/25
• Report Pass: 4/21/25
• Refer: 4/22/25
• Report Pass: 5/1/25
• Refer: 5/6/25
• Refer: 5/14/25
• Report Pass: 5/23/25
• Engrossed: 6/2/25
• Refer: 6/3/25
• Refer: 6/11/25
• Report Pass: 6/24/25
• Refer: 6/25/25
• Report Pass: 7/9/25
• Refer: 7/10/25

Caption

Water: County of Ventura: fire suppression.

Impact

The bill will create a state-mandated local program requiring the Ventura County Fire Department to conduct annual inspections of critical fire suppression infrastructure, including wells and water pumps. Water suppliers will also be obligated to notify emergency services of any reductions in water delivery capacity that could impede firefighting operations. This legislative measure responds directly to the unique fire challenges faced by the County of Ventura, reflecting a tailored approach to local governance by establishing minimum safety standards and emergency protocols.

Summary

Assembly Bill 367 introduces crucial requirements aimed at enhancing fire suppression capabilities in the County of Ventura. Starting July 1, 2027, water suppliers that provide water for fire suppression to over 20 residential dwellings in high or very high fire hazard severity zones will be mandated to have access to backup energy sources. This provision aims to ensure that critical wells and water pumps can function for at least 24 hours to support firefighting efforts during emergencies, significantly impacting local water management and safety regulations in fire-prone areas.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 367 appears to be supportive among local lawmakers and emergency management officials. They view the bill as a significant step toward safeguarding the community against wildfire threats. However, there may also be concerns regarding the financial implications for water suppliers and the potential need for state reimbursements to cover the mandated costs. The legislation acknowledges and responds to the pressing need for enhanced preparedness in the face of growing fire risks due to climate change.

Contention

While AB 367 is largely seen as a proactive measure for public safety, there are points of contention regarding the potential financial burden on local agencies. The California Constitution necessitates that the state reimburse local agencies for mandated costs, which raises questions about the sustainability of funding for these requirements over time. Additionally, the bill's specific focus on the County of Ventura as a special case might spark discussions regarding equity in resource allocation and support for other communities facing similar risks.