Tennessee Senate Bill SB0843

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/4/25
• Engrossed: 4/21/25
• Enrolled: 4/25/25
• Passed: 5/9/25
• Chaptered: 5/15/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 67-4-409, relative to taxes on transfers of realty.

Impact

The impact of SB 843 is significant for the state of Tennessee as it redefines how transfer taxes from real estate are managed and allocated. By ensuring that 3.25 cents of tax levied is specifically directed into the Wetland Acquisition Fund, the bill promotes a proactive approach to wetland conservation. This change is expected to bolster funding for maintaining and enhancing environmental resources within Tennessee, particularly those under the jurisdiction of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. The requirement for legislative approval for expenditures from the fund ensures a level of oversight and accountability in the use of public funds.

Summary

Senate Bill 843 addresses the taxation of transfers of real estate in Tennessee, specifically targeting the allocation of funds derived from this tax. The bill modifies Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 67-4-409, to earmark a portion of the realty transfer taxes collected for the 1986 Wetland Acquisition Fund. This allocation is intended to support the preservation and enhancement of wetland areas, emphasizing the importance of environmental conservation in real estate transactions. The bill also establishes guidelines on the expenditure of these funds, particularly in relation to maintaining state-owned properties and supporting law enforcement personnel associated with wildlife resource management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 843 appears to be largely positive among environmental advocates and conservationists who view the bill as a necessary step toward increasing funding for wetland preservation. Supporters argue that the financial resources redirected through this bill will have long-term benefits for Tennessee’s natural resources and wildlife. Conversely, there may be some apprehension from property developers and real estate professionals concerned about the implications of increased taxation in transfers and potential restrictions on land use as a result of enhanced state oversight on wetlands.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the balancing act between environmental preservation and property rights. Critics may argue that while the intent of enhancing wetland conservation is commendable, the increase in tax obligations could pose difficulties for individuals and businesses involved in real estate transactions. Additionally, discussions might also focus on how the management of these funds will be executed, particularly in ensuring adequate checks are in place to prevent misuse or ineffective allocation of resources. The authority granted to state agencies over local property management can also lead to debates regarding local autonomy versus state enforcement.