Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon Senate Bill SB1035

Introduced
2/18/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Refer
4/7/25  

Caption

Relating to augmentation of firefighting capacity of airports; prescribing an effective date.

Impact

The bill amends existing laws regarding fuel transportation and management during emergencies. It grants significant authority to the Director of Transportation, allowing for the suspension of certain statutes during fire emergencies, thus enabling quicker responses to crises. The bill also introduces provisions for granting funds to airport operators for capital projects aimed at boosting fuel storage capacity, which is paramount during fire emergencies when rapid refueling and aircraft availability can make a significant difference in firefighting efforts.

Summary

Senate Bill 1035 focuses on enhancing the firefighting capabilities at certain airports through statutory changes and grants. The bill mandates the Oregon Department of Emergency Management to procure and maintain vehicles necessary for transporting aviation fuel and personnel to improve fire response efforts. Specifically, it designates Burns Municipal Airport and La Grande/Union County Airport as pilot program airports for this initiative, providing a framework for implementing new resources aimed at addressing fire emergencies effectively.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB1035 is supportive among legislators who view it as a necessary step toward better preparation and response to fire emergencies, particularly in vulnerable areas. By increasing the capacity of airports and streamlining the processes for transportation of aviation fuel, the bill is seen as enhancing the state's ability to protect communities from wildfire threats. However, there may be concerns among stakeholders about the implications of suspending certain regulations during emergencies and how this may affect safety and oversight.

Contention

Notable points of contention focus on the regulatory suspensions that the bill allows during declared emergencies. Critics may argue that such provisions could potentially compromise safety protocols and lead to unregulated circumstances during fires. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the grants and whether they will be adequately funded and implemented across the specified airports is a concern. Stakeholders may advocate for clear guidelines and accountability regarding the management of the resources the bill aims to deploy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB380

Office of the Transportation Inspector General.

CA SB538

Department of Transportation: Chief Advisor on Bicycling and Active Transportation.

CA AB1328

Medi-Cal reimbursements: nonemergency ambulance transportation.

CA SB523

Medi-Cal: emergency medical transport providers: quality assurance fee.

CA AB786

California Transportation Commission: executive director.

CA AB55

Medi-Cal: workforce adjustment for ground ambulance transports.

CA AB1958

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority: board of directors.

CO HB1447

Transit Reform