Georgia House Bill HB419

Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/12/25
• Report Pass: 3/6/25

Caption

Education; require possession of opioid antagonists by institutions within University System of Georgia

Impact

The bill significantly impacts state laws governing education and health by incorporating overdose prevention measures into educational settings. By allowing institutions to possess and administer opioid antagonists, the bill seeks to mitigate the risks associated with opioid overdoses among students and visitors. Furthermore, it specifies that no liability shall accrue to personnel who act in good faith during such emergencies, encouraging proactive responses to overdose situations and aiming to reduce fatalities related to opioid misuse.

Summary

House Bill 419 mandates that institutions within the University System of Georgia and the Technical College System of Georgia maintain a supply of opioid antagonists, such as naloxone, to address opioid overdoses. The bill provides specific definitions for opioid antagonists and outlines the requirements for their possession, storage, and use within educational institutions. It aims to ensure that personnel in these institutions can administer opioid antagonists to individuals experiencing an overdose without facing civil liability, thus promoting a safer environment on college campuses.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 419 is largely positive among advocates for public health and safety. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step in combating the opioid crisis, particularly in environments frequented by young adults. However, there might be some concerns regarding the logistics of implementation and ensuring that schools and universities have the necessary funding and training to effectively manage their opioid antagonist supplies.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve potential challenges associated with the funding required to source and maintain adequate supplies of opioid antagonists and automated external defibrillators (AEDs), as these provisions are subject to community funding sources. Critics may question whether institutions will be able to sustain these measures financially and whether adequate training will be provided to personnel responsible for administering the antagonists. The tension between urgency of overdose responses and the bureaucratic processes in place for medical supplies may result in ongoing debates over effective execution of the bill's provisions.