California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB362

Introduced
2/13/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Report Pass
7/8/25  
Refer
7/8/25  
Refer
7/10/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  
Refer
7/16/25  

Caption

Commercial financing: disclosures.

Impact

The bill proposes significant changes to the California Financial Code, notably by amending existing laws and repealing previous provisions that allowed for certain deceptive practices in the disclosure of financing costs. It aims to prevent misleading representations that could confuse small business owners, thus increasing fair access to financing. By ensuring clarity and requiring honest representation of loan costs, this bill aims to promote a more equitable financing environment for small businesses in California.

Summary

Senate Bill 362, introduced by Senator Grayson, aims to enhance consumer protections in the commercial financing sector by establishing explicit disclosure requirements for providers. The bill specifically prohibits the use of terms like 'interest' or 'rate' in a deceptive manner, ensuring transparency for borrowers by mandating the use of the term 'annual percentage rate' (APR) in particular situations. This reform is intended to help small business owners make more informed financing decisions and avoid confusion stemming from misleading financial jargon.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 362 appears to be generally positive, particularly among proponents advocating for greater consumer protection and financial transparency. Stakeholders express confidence that the bill will lead to a more straightforward banking experience for small businesses. However, there may also be concerns among some financial institutions about the added regulatory burdens and the implications for existing financing practices.

Contention

Despite its supportive stance, the bill raises questions about the balance between regulation and the requirements for commercial lenders. Some opposition may stem from concerns that stringent disclosure regulations could limit the flexibility that lenders currently have in their marketing strategies. The requirement to adhere strictly to APR disclosures could lead to challenges in effectively communicating financing options without the risk of misinterpretation or legal consequences.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB33

Commercial financing: disclosures.

CA SB1482

Commercial financing.

CA SB869

Commercial financing.

CA SB666

Small business: commercial financing transactions.

CA SB1521

Commercial financing transactions: fees.

CA SB1466

Small business: commercial financing transactions: monitoring fees.

CA SB1286

Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: covered debt: commercial debts.

CA SB1156

Groundwater sustainability agencies: conflicts of interest: financial interest disclosures.

CA SB581

Third-party litigation financing.

CA AB376

Student financial aid: Cal Grant C: driver training programs: commercial motor vehicles.

Similar Bills

CA SB1235

Commercial financing: disclosures.

CA SB1269

Schoolbus safety: child safety alert system.

CA SB1482

Commercial financing.

CA SB869

Commercial financing.

CA SB33

Commercial financing: disclosures.

CA SB728

California Consumer Financial Protection Law: commercial financing.

CA SB465

Property Assessed Clean Energy Program: wildfire safety improvements.

CA SB1143

Housing restrictions: sex offenders.