Texas House Bill HB3550

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/28/09
• Voted on by House: 5/18/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/25/09

Caption

Relating to the powers and duties of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and related entities.

Impact

Additionally, the bill proposes amendments to various sections of the Water Code, which governs the operations and decisions of the TCEQ. One notable change is the authority granted to the regulatory body to set interim rates and manage hearings related to utility rates more effectively. This change is designed to streamline the process for handling complaints and rate changes, allowing utilities to deposit rate increases into escrow accounts while waiting for final decisions. The intention is to ensure that any funds collected that are in excess of the ultimate rates determined by the TCEQ can be refunded to consumers with interest.

Summary

House Bill 3550 addresses various aspects of environmental regulation and oversight in Texas, specifically focusing on the powers and responsibilities of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). A significant component of the bill is the establishment of penalty payment plans that allow entities owing civil or administrative penalties to pay in periodic installments rather than in a lump sum. This provision is particularly aimed at supporting smaller businesses by providing them more manageable options for compliance with environmental regulations. The payment period may extend to a maximum of 36 months, facilitating greater financial flexibility.

Contention

During discussions surrounding HB3550, concerns were raised regarding how these changes might affect the regulatory landscape in Texas. Proponents emphasized that the bill would help alleviate burdens for smaller utilities and enhance the TCEQ's ability to manage rate proceedings efficiently. However, critics argued that the provisions could potentially overlook the interests of consumers, especially if interim rates disproportionately benefit utility companies over the public. The balance between effective regulation and consumer protection has become a focal point of contention in committee discussions relating to this bill.