Kentucky House Bill HB546

Kentucky 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/14/25
• Refer: 2/14/25
• Refer: 2/20/25
• Report Pass: 2/25/25
• Engrossed: 2/28/25
• Refer: 2/28/25
• Refer: 3/4/25
• Report Pass: 3/11/25
• Refer: 3/12/25
• Refer: 3/14/25
• Enrolled: 3/14/25
• Vetoed: 3/25/25
• Refer: 3/27/25
• Override: 3/27/25
• Enrolled: 3/27/25
• Chaptered: 3/27/25
• Passed: 3/27/25

Caption

AN ACT relating to transportation, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.

Impact

The introduction of HB 546 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws related to transportation and local government funding. It formalizes the process by which local municipalities can apply for state grants for road rehabilitation projects, thereby streamlining the funding allocation process. Furthermore, it sets a precedent for future infrastructure funding that links state support to local project proposals, ensuring that funds are spent efficiently and according to clearly defined conditions. This bill could provide a much-needed boost in resources for neglected infrastructure, aimed at improving road safety and community accessibility.

Summary

House Bill 546 is an act designed to enhance the management of transportation infrastructure within the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The bill primarily focuses on the establishment of the Local Assistance Road Program (LARP), which aims to allocate funding for the rehabilitation of county roads, streets, and urban roads. This program requires local governments to submit proposals for projects that restore roads to their original conditions without increasing their capacity. Each project may receive up to $500,000, and the funding is contingent on local governments providing a matching contribution based on the county's population ranking.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 546 appears mostly favorable among proponents who view it as a necessary adjustment to improve transportation infrastructure. Supporters argue that the bill will promote better maintenance of local roads and enhance community safety. However, some concerns have been raised about the adequacy of the funding, the bureaucratic process involved, and whether the matching requirements may burden smaller municipalities. Nonetheless, the sentiment is largely positive, reflecting a recognition of the vital need for rehabilitation of aging infrastructure in Kentucky.

Contention

The bill has generated some contention among stakeholders regarding the limits placed on project submissions and the matching funds required from local governments. Critics have expressed concerns that the financial burden of local matches may deter smaller or economically-struggling counties from participating in the program. Additionally, debate has arisen about the selection criteria for ranking projects, as it could impact which areas receive funding priority. Ensuring equitable access to the program and addressing the concerns of diverse localities will be crucial for the successful implementation of HB 546.