Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB26

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/25
• Refer: 2/17/25
• Report Pass: 5/6/25
• Refer: 5/6/25
• Refer: 6/20/25

Caption

Battery or threat to jurors and providing a penalty.

Summary

Assembly Bill 26 (AB26) is a legislative measure introduced in Wisconsin that focuses on the definitions and penalties associated with battery or threats directed towards jurors and their family members. The bill reclassifies the existing misdemeanor battery offense into a Class H felony if the act involves a juror due to their role in the judicial process. Moreover, it stipulates that threats or battery against the family members of jurors also carry the same penal consequences, thereby extending protection beyond the juror themselves. The proposed bill modifies current laws to enable judges to impose restrictions on individuals convicted of such offenses, allowing for prohibitions against any contact with jurors involved in related proceedings during their sentencing or probation periods. This aspect of the bill underscores its strengthening of the protective measures surrounding the juror's participation in the judicial system, recognizing the potential vulnerabilities jurors face as public servants. Supporters of AB26 argue that it is an essential step in safeguarding the integrity of the judicial process and ensuring that jurors can perform their duties without fear of retaliation. By categorizing attacks against jurors and their families as grave offenses, the legislation aims to deter individuals from committing such acts, which can compromise not only the safety of jurors but also the impartiality of the judicial system. Opposition to the bill raises concerns about the implications it may have on free speech and potential overreach in terms of penalizing individuals for conduct that may be subjective in nature. Some argue that while protecting jurors is critical, the legislation could inadvertently criminalize legitimate dissent or criticism related to jury decisions. The discussions highlight a balance that needs to be struck between protecting legal participants and upholding freedom of expression within the community.