Georgia House Bill HB513

Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/25
• Report Pass: 2/27/25
• Engrossed: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/10/25
• Report Pass: 3/20/25
• Enrolled: 4/10/25
• Chaptered: 5/14/25
• Passed: 5/14/25

Caption

Local government; criteria for service delivery strategy; revise provisions

Impact

The proposal carries implications for local government operations, particularly for areas with a mix of municipal and unincorporated regions. By requiring that water and sewer fees for customers outside a service provider's geographic boundaries are not arbitrarily higher, it seeks to rectify perceived inequities in service costs. This can create a more balanced approach to service delivery that respects the needs and economics of both urban and rural populations. Additionally, by implementing regular reviews and potential revisions of the service delivery strategies, the bill sets a framework for continuous improvement and adaptability in response to changing conditions and community needs.

Summary

House Bill 513, which amends several provisions within the Official Code of Georgia, addresses the criteria for service delivery strategies among local governments. Notably, it allows counties and municipalities to retain existing local ordinances regarding video surveillance at gas stations while establishing new criteria that seek to promote the efficient delivery of services. This bill undergoes significant changes aimed at clarifying the responsibility for funding county services specifically for unincorporated areas, thus ensuring that such costs are borne by the beneficiaries of those services, mainly the residents of those areas. By mandating that funding be derived from specific sources and requiring annual reporting, the bill aims to enhance transparency and accountability in local government operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 513, as observed from discussions and voting records, appears predominantly supportive, with a notable majority voting in favor (163 to 2). Proponents argue that the amendments are essential for modernizing local governance and aligning service delivery systems with contemporary community needs. However, some concerns have surfaced regarding the implications of retaining local ordinances, specifically around surveillance, and whether it may infringe on privacy rights. Overall, the bill reflects a careful balancing act between maintaining local authority and ensuring effective governance centered on accountability.

Contention

Discussion around the bill has highlighted some contention, particularly regarding the implications of allowing local ordinances to persist in contexts deemed outdated or overly restrictive. There are fears among opponents that, while the bill seeks to improve service efficiency, it could also enable overly intrusive surveillance practices justified by local governments in the name of public safety. This concern underscores an ongoing debate about the balance between safety measures and individual rights in community governance, suggesting that while the bill moves forward with general support, it requires continued scrutiny as it is implemented.