California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB867

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Engrossed
4/28/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Refer
5/7/25  
Report Pass
6/17/25  
Refer
6/17/25  
Report Pass
6/23/25  

Caption

Veterinary medicine: cat declawing.

Impact

The introduction of AB 867 would represent a substantial shift in how feline declawing is regulated in California. By defining permissible circumstances for these procedures, the bill seeks to prevent non-therapeutic declawing, which has been a point of contention within animal welfare discussions. The bill includes provisions for disciplinary actions against veterinarians who perform these procedures without appropriate therapeutic justification, thereby enhancing accountability in veterinary practices.

Summary

Assembly Bill 867, introduced by Assembly Member Lee, addresses practices within veterinary medicine, specifically focusing on the procedures involved in cat declawing. The bill stipulates that such surgical procedures—including tendonectomy and onychectomy—can only be performed for therapeutic purposes. The regulatory framework established by the existing Veterinary Medicine Practice Act is amended to expand the definition of veterinary practice and set strict conditions under which these procedures can take place.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 867 appears to lean towards a positive reception from animal welfare advocates, who argue that it aligns with growing awareness about the ethical considerations of animal surgeries. However, it is likely to face resistance from some veterinarians and pet owners who may feel that the regulations restrict the choices available to them regarding pet management. Overall, the bill reflects an evolving understanding of animal rights and veterinary ethics.

Contention

A notable point of contention involves local control over animal welfare regulations. The bill explicitly states that it will not preempt local ordinances that were adopted before January 1, 2026. This clause seeks to respect previously established community guidelines while enhancing state-level regulations, yet it may complicate compliance for veterinarians who operate across multiple jurisdictions. As AB 867 progresses through the legislative process, discussions surrounding local versus state authority may intensify.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1399

Veterinary medicine: veterinarian-client-patient relationship: telehealth.

CA AB2133

Veterinary medicine: registered veterinary technicians.

CA AB814

Veterinary medicine: animal physical rehabilitation.

CA SB1478

Veterinary medicine: registered veterinary technicians.

CA SB669

Veterinarians: veterinarian-client-patient relationship.

CA SB1233

Postsecondary education: veterinary medicine: spay and neuter techniques.

CA AB2954

Cats: declawing procedures: prohibition.

CA SB1526

Consumer affairs.

CA AB2194

Physician assistants: supervision: doctors of podiatric medicine.

CA AB1237

Student financial aid: California Public Interest Veterinary Debt Relief Program.

Similar Bills

CA AB1502

Veterinary medicine: California Veterinary Medical Board.

CA AB1535

Veterinary Medical Board: application and examination: discipline and citation.

CA SB1347

Veterinary medicine: license exceptions: limited veterinary services premises registration.

CA AB463

Emergency medical services: dogs and cats.

AZ HB2335

Cat declawing; prohibition; exceptions.

AZ HB2186

Prohibition; cat declawing; exceptions

AZ HB2516

Prohibition; cat declawing; exceptions

AZ HB2224

Cat declawing; prohibition; exceptions