Alcoholic beverage control: neighborhood-restricted special on-sale general licenses.
Impact
The implementation of AB 828 is poised to provide economic benefits by enabling more restaurants and eating establishments in certain areas to serve alcoholic beverages legally. This can enhance the dining experience and potentially increase patronage, thereby promoting local business growth. The bill includes restrictions such as prohibiting the transfer of these licenses for a price greater than the original fee, which aims to prevent price inflation in the licensing market and ensures that these opportunities remain accessible to local entrepreneurs.
Summary
Assembly Bill 828, introduced by Assembly Member Mark Gonzlez, aims to amend the Business and Professions Code in relation to alcoholic beverage control by creating a mechanism for issuing neighborhood-restricted special on-sale general licenses in the County of Los Angeles. The bill stipulates that starting on January 1, 2026, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control may issue no more than 12 new licenses per year, up to a total of 40 new licenses, specifically for bona fide public eating places located within designated census tracts identified in the 2020 Census. This measure is intended to address the unique distribution and market conditions of liquor licenses in this populous area of California.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 828 appears to be generally positive among local business owners and advocates who believe that increased access to liquor licenses can revitalise areas in need of economic stimulation. However, concerns may arise among community groups and policymakers regarding the potential over-saturation of alcohol availability, which could lead to adverse effects on neighborhood safety and quality of life. The legislative discussions indicate a recognition of the balance needed between economic growth and community welfare.
Contention
Notable points of contention may revolve around the specific census tracts chosen for these licenses, as certain neighborhoods could perceive an unfair advantage in competition over those excluded. Additionally, the limited number of licenses and the stipulation that they cannot be transferred outside the designated areas may result in debates over regulatory fairness and access. Proponents argue it is necessary to create tailored legislation for Los Angeles, while opponents may fear it restricts broader access to licenses across the state.
Alcoholic beverages: licenses: new original on-sale general licenses for bona fide public eating places: neighborhood-restricted special on-sale general licenses.