The introduction of AB 915 is expected to streamline the regulatory process for energy storage projects in Kern County, fostering an efficient pathway for innovative energy solutions. By reducing state oversight, the bill aims to encourage the development of energy storage facilities that utilize compressed air technology, which may enhance energy resilience in the region. However, this reduction of oversight also raises concerns about maintaining safety standards and environmental protections, particularly in a state where water resources are critically managed. Proponents argue that the unique nature of the projects in Kern justifies the special exemption, while critics caution about potential risks associated with diminished regulatory scrutiny.
Summary
Assembly Bill No. 915, introduced by Assembly Member Petrie-Norris, aims to amend Section 6025.5 of the Water Code relating to dam safety and state supervision. The bill seeks to exempt certain water storage facilities and structures associated with an energy storage system facility using compressed air technology located in the County of Kern from state regulation. This legislative move aligns with existing laws that already exempt wastewater treatment and storage ponds from state oversight, provided they meet established criteria. AB 915 specifies criteria, including a maximum water pool height of 25 feet and a storage capacity of 1,500 acre-feet, as well as requirements for design supervision by a registered civil engineer.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 915 appears divided among stakeholders. Supporters, including members of the local government and business communities, view the bill as a proactive step towards advancing energy infrastructure and economic growth in Kern County. They believe it fosters innovation by removing bureaucratic impediments. Conversely, environmental advocacy groups express skepticism, arguing that less oversight could lead to potential environmental degradation or safety hazards. This reflects a broader tension in California regarding balancing economic development with robust environmental safeguards.
Contention
Notable points of contention revolve around the perceived risks of the exemptions proposed by AB 915. Opponents argue that any easing of regulation could set a precedent that may lead to inadequate safety measures in future construction. This could particularly pertain to the structures that are not only intended for energy storage but also interact with the intricacies of water resource management in the state. The legislative findings included in the bill suggest that a special statute is necessary due to the unique nature of the projects in Kern County, indicating an intent to provide tailored regulatory relief, a point that may be contentious among broader regulatory practices in California.