Protected species: California Endangered Species Act.
Impact
If passed, AB 1319 will significantly affect state laws related to the management and protection of endangered species within California. It will create new enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with federal regulations concerning endangered species, thus enhancing California's regulatory framework. The bill specifies that individuals or entities may have their seized property forfeited upon conviction. Furthermore, it establishes a provisional candidate species list and demands state regulatory action in response to decreases in federal protections, potentially leading to reassessments of species classifications and protections under California law.
Summary
Assembly Bill 1319, introduced by Assembly Member Schultz, proposes amendments to the California Fish and Game Code regarding the protection of endangered species. The bill makes it unlawful to import, export, or sell any fish, wildlife, or plant taken in violation of any state or federal law, with specific dates set for compliance. The main aim is to prevent the trade and movement of species that have been improperly taken, as defined by state and federal regulations. The bill sets forth criminal penalties for violations, including substantial fines and imprisonment, thereby reinforcing California's commitment to protecting its wildlife and natural resources.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 1319 appears to be mixed. Proponents laud the bill as a vital step toward stronger protections for endangered species, ensuring that California does not backtrack on wildlife conservation efforts in light of potential federal deregulation. Environmental advocacy groups and many lawmakers support these initiatives. However, some stakeholders, including industry representatives and those concerned about regulatory overreach, express apprehension regarding the burdens that new penalties might impose, particularly on entities that rely on the transportation and trade of wildlife.
Contention
A critical point of contention relates to the penalties established in AB 1319, which some argue may be too punitive for initial offenses, raising concerns about equity and fairness in enforcement. Additionally, there are worries about the potential impacts on local businesses and industries dependent on wildlife trade. The bill's provision that prohibits criminal liability for entities complying with federal biological opinions seeks to balance federal and state obligations but may lead to disputes over jurisdiction and the interpretation of compliance standards.
Personal income taxes: voluntary contributions: Endangered and Rare Fish, Wildlife, and Plant Species Conservation and Enhancement Account: Native California Wildlife Rehabilitation Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund: covered grants.