California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB775

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/4/25  
Refer
6/16/25  
Engrossed
6/4/25  
Refer
6/16/25  
Refer
7/2/25  
Report Pass
7/8/25  
Refer
7/8/25  

Caption

Board of Psychology and Board of Behavioral Sciences.

Impact

The bill proposes several changes to licensure requirements, such as allowing out-of-state license holders to provide psychological services under certain conditions, including informing clients of the temporary nature of their services. Furthermore, the bill expands the study areas accepted for psychological testing technician licenses and includes new regulations for psychological associates who graduated from foreign institutions. These amendments are expected to enhance the accessibility of licensed psychological services and maintain California's standards in mental health care.

Summary

Senate Bill 775, introduced by Senator Ashby, seeks to amend several provisions related to the licensing and regulation of mental health professionals, including psychologists, therapists, and social workers. One of its main objectives is to extend the operation of the Board of Psychology, which currently faces a sunset deadline of January 1, 2026, pushing it forward to January 1, 2030. By doing so, it aims to maintain oversight and regulation for mental health professionals in California, facilitating consistency in the practice and provision of psychological services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 775 appears to be generally supportive among those within the mental health community, as the bill aims to address ongoing issues of licensure and regulatory oversight. However, there remain some concerns regarding the expanded definitions of unprofessional conduct and the implications of such conditions for practitioners. The proposal to provide a clearer framework around video supervision and telehealth services is praised, reflecting the increasing reliance on technology in mental health service delivery.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's expansion of the definition of unprofessional conduct for research psychoanalysts, which could lead to increased scrutiny and potential repercussions for practitioners. Some lawmakers and stakeholders are cautious about how these changes will affect the professional landscape, particularly around the training requirements for therapists in detecting various types of abuse and dependency. Additionally, the bill implies a state-mandated local program for any violations, heightening the stakes for practitioners who must navigate these evolving standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB373

Board of Behavioral Sciences, Board of Psychology, and Veterinary Medical Board: licensees’ and registrants’ addresses.

CA SB1024

Healing arts: Board of Behavioral Sciences: licensees and registrants.

CA AB282

Psychologists: licensure.

CA AB2051

Psychology interjurisdictional compact.

CA SB815

Healing arts.

CA AB1450

Behavioral health: behavioral health and wellness screenings: notice.

CA AB2703

Federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics: psychological associates.

CA AB1977

Health care coverage: behavioral diagnoses.

CA AB3253

Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists: licensees: professional land surveyors: surveying practices: monuments and corner accessories.

CA AB268

Board of State and Community Corrections.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.