California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB702

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  
Refer
3/26/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  
Refer
4/8/25  
Refer
3/26/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/8/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Report Pass
6/26/25  
Refer
6/26/25  
Refer
6/26/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  
Refer
7/2/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  

Caption

Legislative and gubernatorial appointments: report.

Impact

Starting January 1, 2027, the legislation requires the publication of annual reports on appointed individuals, noting their aggregate demographic information. This requirement is designed to promote equity and inclusion within state appointments, allowing for the evaluation of demographic diversity among appointees. The reports will include self-reported information such as ethnicity, gender identity, and military service, thus fostering accountability regarding the representation within state boards and commissions.

Summary

Senate Bill 702 aims to enhance transparency around gubernatorial and legislative appointments in California. The bill mandates the Governor to maintain an updated online list of all state boards and commissions, including details such as membership, purpose, duties, and meeting frequency. By establishing this accessible digital registry, SB702 seeks to provide clarity on the appointment process and ensure that community members have insight into the composition and responsibilities of various oversight bodies within the state government.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB702 has been generally positive among proponents who argue that the bill fosters transparency and trust in government processes. Advocates highlight that public awareness of appointment demographics can lead to greater efforts towards diversity and inclusion in public appointments. However, there may be apprehensions from some quarters regarding the effectiveness and privacy concerns relating to the reporting of personal demographic information.

Contention

One notable point of contention may arise from the bill's treatment of appointments made by statute versus ex officio appointments, the latter being excluded from demographic reporting. Critics may argue that excluding certain appointments could skew the representation narrative or overlook significant segments of appointed individuals. Furthermore, reliance on self-reported data may raise questions about the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, impacting the bill's intended goals for transparency and accountability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB702

Gubernatorial appointments: report.

CA SB782

Gubernatorial appointments: report.

CA ACA9

Superintendent of Public Instruction: gubernatorial appointment.

CA SB259

Reports submitted to legislative committees.

CA AB2613

Jacqueline Marie Zbur Rare Disease Advisory Council.

CA AB799

Interagency Council on Homelessness: funding: state programs.

CA SB54

Venture capital companies: reporting.

CA AB2207

State boards and commissions: representatives of older adults.

CA SB1016

Latino and Indigenous Disparities Reduction Act.

CA AB1142

Community colleges: costs for using facilities or grounds.

Similar Bills

CA SB702

Gubernatorial appointments: report.

CA SB782

Gubernatorial appointments: report.

CA SB1387

Gubernatorial appointments: report.

CA SB702

Gubernatorial appointments: report.

CA AB935

State agencies: complaints: demographic data.

CA SB1019

Medi-Cal managed care plans: mental health benefits.