California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB738

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Refer
3/26/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  

Caption

The Reclaim Act.

Impact

By defining and broadening the definition of a vexatious litigant, SB738 will empower courts to take action against those who engage in abusive litigation tactics. This change is expected to alleviate the financial and emotional stress placed on victims who are often forced to deal with excessive legal proceedings designed to harass them. The legislation also aims to streamline court procedures related to protective orders, making it easier for survivors to regain their autonomy without the burden of ongoing litigation that disrupts their recovery process.

Summary

Senate Bill 738, known as the Reclaim Act, aims to amend the Code of Civil Procedure and the Family Code to strengthen protections for survivors of domestic violence by addressing litigation abuse. The bill expands the definition of a vexatious litigant and allows courts to declare individuals as such not only when restraining orders are active but also when such orders have expired or been modified. One of the pivotal goals of this legislation is to mitigate the misuse of legal processes by an abuser, which is often employed to further intimidate or control their victims through repetitive and unwarranted legal actions.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB738 is generally supportive, as it aligns with broader legislative goals of protecting vulnerable populations from abuse. Advocates for domestic violence survivors view the bill as a significant step towards reformation of court procedures that historically have failed to consider the implications of litigation abuse. However, there are some concerns regarding the balance between preventing frivolous litigation and safeguarding the rights of defendants, which could lead to discussions around potential overreach in its application.

Contention

Despite the overall positive outlook for SB738, notable points of contention include how the bill's provisions may be interpreted in different contexts, particularly concerning the definitions of 'frivolous' and 'abusive' litigation. Critics argue that this could potentially lead to misuse in legal defenses against legitimate claims. Furthermore, while the bill's intention is to support victims, balancing this with the rights of those accused of vexatious litigation creates a complex legal landscape that may need further clarifications in its executions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB741

Domestic violence restraining orders: prehearing discovery.

CA SB1000

Connected devices: device protection requests.

CA SB459

Domestic violence: restraining orders.

CA AB2907

Firearms: restrained persons.

CA AB36

Domestic violence protective orders: possession of a firearm.

CA AB467

Domestic violence: restraining orders.

CA SB554

Restraining orders.

CA AB3209

Crimes: theft: retail theft restraining orders.

CA AB304

Domestic violence: probation.

CA AB1931

Criminal procedure: protective orders.

Similar Bills

CA SB741

Domestic violence restraining orders: prehearing discovery.

CA AB2391

Civil actions: vexatious litigants.

CA AB2232

Accessibility to emergency information and services: emergency shelters: persons with pets.

CA SB554

Restraining orders.

CA AB514

Injunctions: undertakings: civil actions: distribution of sexually explicit materials.

CA SB50

Connected devices: device protection requests.

CA AB1979

Doxing Victims Recourse Act.

CA AB602

Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action.