Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HB1526

Introduced
2/24/25  
Refer
2/24/25  
Report Pass
3/5/25  

Caption

No Rogue Rulings Act or NORRAThis bill limits the authority of federal district courts to issue injunctions.Specifically, it prohibits a district court from issuing an injunction unless the injunction applies only to the parties of the particular case before the court.

Impact

The passage of HB 1526 would significantly alter the landscape of federal court authority, especially concerning cases involving state challenges against federal actions. The bill restricts the ability of courts to issue wide-ranging prohibitive injunctions which could affect multiple parties, emphasizing a more localized or specific approach to legal remedies. Critics argue that this could impair the ability of courts to address urgent and large-scale injustices that might require immediate and expansive legal relief, thereby raising serious concerns about access to justice for those vulnerable to federal actions.

Summary

House Bill 1526, known as the 'No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025' (NORRA), seeks to amend Title 28 of the United States Code by restricting the authority of district courts to issue injunctive relief. This legislation intends to confine the issuance of injunctive orders to cases where they apply solely to the parties involved in a specific case, which proponents argue will streamline judicial processes and uphold the integrity of the judiciary’s role. By allowing exceptions only in multi-state challenges against executive actions, where a three-judge panel may grant broader injunctive relief, the bill aims to limit what is perceived as judicial overreach by district courts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1526 is markedly divided. Supporters, predominantly from the Republican side, advocate for the bill as a necessary measure to rein in judicial authority and prevent what they see as 'rogue rulings' that could disrupt federal governance. They argue that applying stricter limits on injunctive relief will preserve the constitutional balance of power. In contrast, opponents, including many Democratic legislators and legal advocacy groups, criticize the act as a detrimental limitation on judicial oversight and a potential infringement on citizens' rights to challenge executive actions effectively.

Contention

Key points of contention include concerns about the implications for citizens' legal recourse. By restricting the scope of injunctive relief, critics maintain that individuals and states may find it significantly harder to contest federal actions that could have widespread negative impacts. Furthermore, the provision allowing only a three-judge panel to review certain cases highlights fears of increased politicization within the judiciary, which could undermine public trust in judicial impartiality. Overall, the legislation has fueled a broader debate about the role of the judiciary in maintaining checks and balances within the federal system.

Congress_id

119-HR-1526

Policy_area

Law

Introduced_date

2025-02-24

Companion Bills

US HR282

Related bill Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

US HR294

Related bill Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

Previously Filed As

US HB89

Injunctive Authority Clarification Act of 2023 This bill prohibits federal courts from issuing injunctive orders that bar enforcement of a federal law or policy against a nonparty, unless the nonparty is represented by a party in a class action lawsuit.

US HB85

This bill grants exclusive jurisdiction to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia over (1) cases arising under immigration laws, or (2) claims by foreign nationals challenging an order of removal or another action authorized under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

US HB3652

Fair Courts Act of 2023

US SB1758

Fair Courts Act of 2023

US HB51

Washington, D.C. Admission Act This bill provides for the admission of the state of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth into the United States. The commonwealth consists of all the territory of the District of Columbia (DC), excluding certain federal property. The excluded property shall be known as the Capital and serve as the seat of federal government; it includes the principal federal monuments, the White House, the Capitol Building, the Supreme Court Building, and the federal office buildings located adjacent to the Mall and Capitol Building. In addition, the bill maintains the federal government's authority over military lands and specified other property and prohibits the commonwealth from taxing federal property except as permitted by Congress. Within 30 days of this bill's enactment, the DC mayor must call for the election of two Senators and one Representative for the commonwealth. The commonwealth shall be admitted into the United States upon a presidential proclamation announcing the results of that election. The bill applies current DC laws to the commonwealth and continues pending judicial proceedings. It also continues certain federal authorities and responsibilities, including regarding employee benefits, agencies, and courts, until the commonwealth certifies that it is prepared to take over those authorities and responsibilities. Further, the bill provides for expedited consideration of a joint resolution to repeal the Twenty-third Amendment to the Constitution (which allows DC citizens to vote in presidential elections). The bill also establishes a commission to advise the President, Congress, and DC and commonwealth leaders on the transition.

US SB51

Washington, D.C. Admission Act This bill provides for the admission of the state of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth into the United States. The commonwealth consists of all the territory of the District of Columbia (DC), excluding certain federal property. The excluded property shall be known as the Capital and serve as the seat of federal government; it includes the principal federal monuments, the White House, the Capitol Building, the Supreme Court Building, and the federal office buildings located adjacent to the Mall and Capitol Building. In addition, the bill maintains the federal government's authority over military lands and specified other property and prohibits the commonwealth from taxing federal property except as permitted by Congress. Within 30 days of this bill's enactment, the DC mayor must call for the election of two Senators and one Representative for the commonwealth. The commonwealth shall be admitted into the United States upon a presidential proclamation announcing the results of that election. The bill applies current DC laws to the commonwealth and continues pending judicial proceedings. It also continues certain federal authorities and responsibilities, including regarding employee benefits, agencies, and courts, until the commonwealth certifies that it is prepared to take over those authorities and responsibilities. Further, the bill provides for expedited consideration of a joint resolution to repeal the Twenty-third Amendment to the Constitution (which allows DC citizens to vote in presidential elections). The bill also establishes a commission to advise the President, Congress, and DC and commonwealth leaders on the transition.

US HB532

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 600 East First Street in Rome, Georgia, as the "Harold L. Murphy Federal Building and United States Courthouse".

US HB7724

Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2024

US HB2095

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for District of Columbia, Federal Payment for the DC Courts, Capital Improvements for DC courthouse facilities for fiscal year 2024.

US HB2092

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for District of Columbia, Federal Payment for the DC Courts, DC Court of Appeals for fiscal year 2024.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.